Jump to content

Is the Video Shop on Lordship Lane closing for good?

Weegee

By Weegee
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

BillyPilgrim

BillyPilgrim

Posted
Posted

Easties EL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They should of brought in obscure movies from

> france and japan.


They did. I rented Jean-Luc Godard's "Week End" from there once. That's been out of circulation for years. I'm really sad to see it go, they had a really good back catalogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

MungoJerrysBeard77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Judging by the empty shop next door to the Co-op

> funeral place, I reckon it'll stay empty for a

> while yet


Indeed, although I've been curious as to why that stays empty for so long. The video shop's only what 50 yards away from I guess - I just looked at google streetview and the shop next to the video shop's empty - what's in there now as I can't remember?


There's a whole thread on what ED needs on here and that's a decent sized shop with I'm sure a decent size rent - it'll be interesting to see how the real world fills this one, as well as the stationers and the one next to the Co-op.


My vote is for a car dealer, plenty of pavement there eh? ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

jctg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely it should be an Our Price?


I respectfully disagree about Our Price JCTG.

Know the price of everything and the value of nothing seems to be their mission statement/philosophy/paraphrased Irish writer quote.

They should really emblazon it across their LP carrier bags.

But they probably won't, what with them being breadheads and everything.


All in all, a Wimpy Bar would be the best local facility.

Seriously, I could murder a Chocolate Bowler right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

bookhopper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> McDonalds or burger king. Yes. Im serious.


No BookHopper, you're not. What's the opposite of serious? That's what you're being.


You're a bit of an ol' mischief is what you are.


Press for a Wimpy Bar though and I can guarantee to throw considerable support behind you.

An offer, I assure you comes with a Chocolate Bowler should the good people of the Wimpy family achieve their Lordship Lane ambitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

bookhopper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am infact being serious. But thanks for telling

> me what I am (I do love when people who know

> NOTHING about me tell me what I am)

> However, a wimpy will also do for me.


*clasps imaginary handbag to chest and goes Ooooooo*


Glad you agree about the Wimpy BH, it would be a fine addition to the locality.

Of course I know NOTHING about your good self and I meant nothing more than a mildish nudge-in-the-ribs jest.

No offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • first mate
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By first mate · Posted

      Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • first mate
      Cyclists taking over paths!!

      By first mate · Posted

      You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Earl Aelfheah
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme), suggested they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows majority support across London.
    • first mate
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By first mate · Posted

      Rockets said: "Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway" This.   

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...