Jump to content

Fare dodging on the 12


Shaila Shah

Recommended Posts

Fare dodging - we probably think it's only the bad mannered "yoof" and ill tempered feisty people who do this. But no. Last week, our bus got held up by inspectors (rare occurrence) and a young suited and booted male clutching a copy of the FT was found to have not done what he should have. Result? Bus delayed, train missed. All to save ?1.20. What sort of example is this setting???
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pathetic isn't it?


I have lost count of the amount of times I have seen this happen. You are right, the sad thing I noticed is the time I was on the 12 it was 2 professional looking ladies talking about some shoes they had bought. Maybe the savings of not paying the fare!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the 12 everyday and it is amazing how many peoples oysters get "touched on" when the inspectors get on. I find myself turning my ipod off to hear the excuses. "I did put it on" ... no actually luv I saw you get on and you didnt. It costs just over ?60 for a bus pass BUY ONE.

I totally agree that it isnt just the "youth of today" it is the suits that are getting stopped too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys - more fool you for judging a book by its cover. It's riddiculous to assume that someone reading the FT is trustworthy.


Incidentally, I never touch in on the number 12 because I have a bus pass so please don't assume that everyone who doesn't touch in isn't paying the fare; not everyone is pay-as-you go. I for one will be glad to see the back of the bendy buses - I never feel safe on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone's needs to fare-dodge once in a while when the need arises - and I can confirm that the 12 is a breeze in this respect.


Still, it doesn't compare to the glory days of The Great Travelcard Glitch of 1999, when any daily travelcard dated 1998 worked over the whole tube network for nearly the whole of 1999. Happy days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guys - more fool you for judging a book by its

> cover. It's riddiculous to assume that someone

> reading the FT is trustworthy.


so very true GG - appearances can be deceptive (its the Grauniad readers I worry about...)


> Incidentally, I never touch in on the number 12

> because I have a bus pass so please don't assume

> that everyone who doesn't touch in isn't paying

> the fare; not everyone is pay-as-you go. I for

> one will be glad to see the back of the bendy

> buses - I never feel safe on them.


ah....that explains it. i wondered why some people didn't use the oyster reader (thought you had to touch in/out each time)


brilliant news they are getting rid of the bendy 12 bus - i hate them too (the 176 is soooo much nicer)


see below an abstract from my latest paper due for publication: 'why people fare dodge on the 12 and other bendy buses: the politics, economics and psychology of commuter behaviour'


people who get on at the front = generally pay but sometimes don't

people who get on at the middle = sometimes pay but often don't

people who get on at the back = often don't pay but sometimes do


:)





edited for no reason (and because aliens have taken control of my laptop)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a night bus from North London down to Traf Sq about 18 months ago - and 5 or 6 inspectors jumped on mid-way at about 3 o'clock in the morning (it was mid-week as well) and they must have nabbed the majority of people as not having a valid fare (approx 10 ppl were done).


As someone said above if you have a season ticket oyster then you don't need to swipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, I LOVE the 12 - the bendy bus massively cut journey times on that route, although that seems to have ebbed away over the past year or so.


But I have, once or twice, not paid my fare on there. Not intentionally, but having got on the bus thinking I had a juiced-up oyster card, finding that I didn't, and having the choice to get off at the next stop, go and find an oyster topper upper and catch the next bus, making me late, or not. I didn't do it. You can shoot me if you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There have been at least two or three threads on the topic in the last couple of years. I'm afraid they'll all confirm that you assumed wrongly.  I remember looking into it myself and finding nothing to assist anyone who made the same assumption. While recently having a look through the Townley Road appeals decided in 2023, I came across this determination that also clearly spells it out. 31/3/23 Reasons     Mr X appeals against two Penalty Charge Notices. He argues that they have only been issued in order to make money for the council. Mr X states that the restrictions were introduced to make it safe for school students in the morning and afternoon and that as both 26th December 2022 and 2nd January 2023 were public holidays there was no purpose in enforcing the restriction. The appellant states that he was driving to collect an elderly relative. Townley Road is a route that is for buses, cycles and taxis only Monday to Friday 8-9am and 3-4.30pm. The restriction is in operation every Monday to Friday whether or not schools are on holiday or if it is a bank or public holiday. There was no indication on the sign that the prohibition was not being enforced on either Monday 26th December or Monday 2nd January. I have seen the CCTV footage in relation to each contravention. I have also  seen photographs of the signs and camera car footage that show the signs  and warning signs. I find that the signs are clear and that there is sufficient  warning of the restriction to enable a driver to take an alternative route. I find that each contravention occurred. I refuse both appeals.
    • I suggest you write to the estate agent asking specific questions and request a written response. Otherwise they will tell you anything to get a sale.
    • Hello, I walked past this a few minutes ago on the corner of Shawbury Road X Lordship Lane. Had a look, put it back but then saw the cut security chain as well 20 meter down the road and thought someone definitely is missing at least some handlebars. If they are still there when I come back I can take them in as I live on the next street, please DM me to arrange pickup if they belong to you.   --- UPDATE: 20:02 PM, it's still there.   I've decided not to touch it again or take it with me as it's oily and the wife will not appreciate it.
    • There is a lovely children's cafe near Peckham Park  Also there's a art place which does kids art classes etc near East Dulwich Station 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...