Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fare dodging - we probably think it's only the bad mannered "yoof" and ill tempered feisty people who do this. But no. Last week, our bus got held up by inspectors (rare occurrence) and a young suited and booted male clutching a copy of the FT was found to have not done what he should have. Result? Bus delayed, train missed. All to save ?1.20. What sort of example is this setting???
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12643-fare-dodging-on-the-12/
Share on other sites

Pathetic isn't it?


I have lost count of the amount of times I have seen this happen. You are right, the sad thing I noticed is the time I was on the 12 it was 2 professional looking ladies talking about some shoes they had bought. Maybe the savings of not paying the fare!

I get the 12 everyday and it is amazing how many peoples oysters get "touched on" when the inspectors get on. I find myself turning my ipod off to hear the excuses. "I did put it on" ... no actually luv I saw you get on and you didnt. It costs just over ?60 for a bus pass BUY ONE.

I totally agree that it isnt just the "youth of today" it is the suits that are getting stopped too.

Guys - more fool you for judging a book by its cover. It's riddiculous to assume that someone reading the FT is trustworthy.


Incidentally, I never touch in on the number 12 because I have a bus pass so please don't assume that everyone who doesn't touch in isn't paying the fare; not everyone is pay-as-you go. I for one will be glad to see the back of the bendy buses - I never feel safe on them.

Everyone's needs to fare-dodge once in a while when the need arises - and I can confirm that the 12 is a breeze in this respect.


Still, it doesn't compare to the glory days of The Great Travelcard Glitch of 1999, when any daily travelcard dated 1998 worked over the whole tube network for nearly the whole of 1999. Happy days.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guys - more fool you for judging a book by its

> cover. It's riddiculous to assume that someone

> reading the FT is trustworthy.


so very true GG - appearances can be deceptive (its the Grauniad readers I worry about...)


> Incidentally, I never touch in on the number 12

> because I have a bus pass so please don't assume

> that everyone who doesn't touch in isn't paying

> the fare; not everyone is pay-as-you go. I for

> one will be glad to see the back of the bendy

> buses - I never feel safe on them.


ah....that explains it. i wondered why some people didn't use the oyster reader (thought you had to touch in/out each time)


brilliant news they are getting rid of the bendy 12 bus - i hate them too (the 176 is soooo much nicer)


see below an abstract from my latest paper due for publication: 'why people fare dodge on the 12 and other bendy buses: the politics, economics and psychology of commuter behaviour'


people who get on at the front = generally pay but sometimes don't

people who get on at the middle = sometimes pay but often don't

people who get on at the back = often don't pay but sometimes do


:)





edited for no reason (and because aliens have taken control of my laptop)

I got a night bus from North London down to Traf Sq about 18 months ago - and 5 or 6 inspectors jumped on mid-way at about 3 o'clock in the morning (it was mid-week as well) and they must have nabbed the majority of people as not having a valid fare (approx 10 ppl were done).


As someone said above if you have a season ticket oyster then you don't need to swipe.

Firstly, I LOVE the 12 - the bendy bus massively cut journey times on that route, although that seems to have ebbed away over the past year or so.


But I have, once or twice, not paid my fare on there. Not intentionally, but having got on the bus thinking I had a juiced-up oyster card, finding that I didn't, and having the choice to get off at the next stop, go and find an oyster topper upper and catch the next bus, making me late, or not. I didn't do it. You can shoot me if you like.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...