Jump to content

OK, yes you "It's The W**F Lottery" pick a number between 1 & 3724


Recommended Posts

Ooooo




Sub zero -6


Well, what an interesting call Narn's however, this is W**F Lotto we are playing here & I'm a stickler for the rules


( and i'm having to put you "into Nidd" for that illegal call )



*rips silver duct tape off top lip*



W**F



F those F's

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > btw, there's nothing in the small print to say

> > what prize we will win if we pick the lucky

> > number.

>

> Good point Katie273737!

>

>

> (PS you still on-line? LOL)


no I'm not. someone else is impersonating me again (and not very well either I might add, tsk)

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ooooo

>

>

>

> Sub zero -6

>

> Well, what an interesting call Narn's however,

> this is W**F Lotto we are playing here & I'm a

> stickler for the rules

>

> ( and i'm having to put you "into Nidd" for that

> illegal call )

>

>

> *rips silver duct tape of top lip*

>

>

> W**F



You didn't disappoint Willy-Woof! That's told him!!!!




*rolling on floor laughing hysterically*

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > btw, there's nothing in the small print to say

> > what prize we will win if we pick the lucky

> > number.

>

> Good point Katie273737!

>

>

> (PS you still on-line? LOL)


----------------------------------------

Every number...


...is a "lucky number"



* prizes, more like "suprises" *



( now where was I...?)


Ah yes The LYM , 1949 (MCMXLIX) was a common year starting on Saturday


( fairly "dull" choice really, still, you pick em )



W**F

well that's me told - my dad was born that year and without him there would be no LYM - therefore I am sticking with my first choice.


I would also like to think that the ski resort in Squaw Valley, California openning is pretty major event!!!

Oh Dogger..


It's on the board & in the draw


109 The cycle of the decimal equivalent of 1/109 ends ...853211, the first six Fibonacci numbers in reversed order.


( there you go & TheLostYorkie though he got the sh!tty stick )



W**F

Cat in a Hot Tin Bus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lucky number 8 please

>

> Purrfect

----------------------------------------------

CIAHTB...


Here you go, a Chinese 8


It's in the draw & on the board




Learn this by Friday or you are OUT of the draw, plus if you though my sending Narnia "into Nidd" was bad, then you have seriously underestimated the colour of my fury



Now, "crack on "



W**F

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1997 for me please woof (might as well eh?)

>

> btw, there's nothing in the small print to say

> what prize we will win if we pick the lucky

> number.

--------------------------------------------------


OK Katie, just a quick "rustle" in the "prize safe" & the first one I've managed to grab ,is...


http://www.ovcart.com/images/inventory/9658.1669.full.jpg


Now, how FAB is that ?


( & I thought rats had gnawed the whole prize safe )


Just think, IF you are one of the many* winners of the W**FLottery then that prize could be yourz*



W**F



Disclaimer & terminology


Many* may refer to:

plural

A quantifier that can be used with count nouns - often preceded by "as" or "too" or "so" or "that"; amounting to a large but indefinite number; "many temptations"; "a good many but not a lot"; "many directions"; not on my shift more than a few less, oh, & not more than several


Yourz* NOT to be confused with Yours

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Narnia Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pi

>

> Well?


____________________________________


Narnia...



You are "in Nidd" so this means you miss 3 turns


( everyone should know this )



Remind me later or wait for the "rule of dusk" to naturally kick in



W**F

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's later now..............

>

> What exactly is wrong with my -6 and/or Pi? Rules

> please.

-------------------------------


Well...


Pi isn't a pure number as such , though the Church did lazily try and round it up to 4


-6 falls outside of the zero base line zone thus rendering itself invalid


Also I reject your 3Rd turn formally & you are now out of "In Nidd"


You may now submit your chosen number on your next "go"


Good luck


W**F

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I might appreciate being out of 'In Nidd' if I

> knew what is was. When will my next go be then?

>

> PS When did you say the numbers had to be 'pure'?

____________________________________________________


So...


You are "technically" out of being "In Nidd" however, you have just "had a go" but didn't offer a number, so you're back "In Nidd" again


[pre]

Q. PS When did you say the numbers had to be 'pure'?

[/pre]

A. In my last post



W**F


(the "conundrum number" move could be played here BTW)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years      
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...