Jump to content

OK, yes you "It's The W**F Lottery" pick a number between 1 & 3724


Recommended Posts

Ooooo




Sub zero -6


Well, what an interesting call Narn's however, this is W**F Lotto we are playing here & I'm a stickler for the rules


( and i'm having to put you "into Nidd" for that illegal call )



*rips silver duct tape off top lip*



W**F



F those F's

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > btw, there's nothing in the small print to say

> > what prize we will win if we pick the lucky

> > number.

>

> Good point Katie273737!

>

>

> (PS you still on-line? LOL)


no I'm not. someone else is impersonating me again (and not very well either I might add, tsk)

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ooooo

>

>

>

> Sub zero -6

>

> Well, what an interesting call Narn's however,

> this is W**F Lotto we are playing here & I'm a

> stickler for the rules

>

> ( and i'm having to put you "into Nidd" for that

> illegal call )

>

>

> *rips silver duct tape of top lip*

>

>

> W**F



You didn't disappoint Willy-Woof! That's told him!!!!




*rolling on floor laughing hysterically*

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > btw, there's nothing in the small print to say

> > what prize we will win if we pick the lucky

> > number.

>

> Good point Katie273737!

>

>

> (PS you still on-line? LOL)


----------------------------------------

Every number...


...is a "lucky number"



* prizes, more like "suprises" *



( now where was I...?)


Ah yes The LYM , 1949 (MCMXLIX) was a common year starting on Saturday


( fairly "dull" choice really, still, you pick em )



W**F

well that's me told - my dad was born that year and without him there would be no LYM - therefore I am sticking with my first choice.


I would also like to think that the ski resort in Squaw Valley, California openning is pretty major event!!!

Oh Dogger..


It's on the board & in the draw


109 The cycle of the decimal equivalent of 1/109 ends ...853211, the first six Fibonacci numbers in reversed order.


( there you go & TheLostYorkie though he got the sh!tty stick )



W**F

Cat in a Hot Tin Bus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lucky number 8 please

>

> Purrfect

----------------------------------------------

CIAHTB...


Here you go, a Chinese 8


It's in the draw & on the board




Learn this by Friday or you are OUT of the draw, plus if you though my sending Narnia "into Nidd" was bad, then you have seriously underestimated the colour of my fury



Now, "crack on "



W**F

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1997 for me please woof (might as well eh?)

>

> btw, there's nothing in the small print to say

> what prize we will win if we pick the lucky

> number.

--------------------------------------------------


OK Katie, just a quick "rustle" in the "prize safe" & the first one I've managed to grab ,is...


http://www.ovcart.com/images/inventory/9658.1669.full.jpg


Now, how FAB is that ?


( & I thought rats had gnawed the whole prize safe )


Just think, IF you are one of the many* winners of the W**FLottery then that prize could be yourz*



W**F



Disclaimer & terminology


Many* may refer to:

plural

A quantifier that can be used with count nouns - often preceded by "as" or "too" or "so" or "that"; amounting to a large but indefinite number; "many temptations"; "a good many but not a lot"; "many directions"; not on my shift more than a few less, oh, & not more than several


Yourz* NOT to be confused with Yours

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Narnia Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pi

>

> Well?


____________________________________


Narnia...



You are "in Nidd" so this means you miss 3 turns


( everyone should know this )



Remind me later or wait for the "rule of dusk" to naturally kick in



W**F

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's later now..............

>

> What exactly is wrong with my -6 and/or Pi? Rules

> please.

-------------------------------


Well...


Pi isn't a pure number as such , though the Church did lazily try and round it up to 4


-6 falls outside of the zero base line zone thus rendering itself invalid


Also I reject your 3Rd turn formally & you are now out of "In Nidd"


You may now submit your chosen number on your next "go"


Good luck


W**F

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I might appreciate being out of 'In Nidd' if I

> knew what is was. When will my next go be then?

>

> PS When did you say the numbers had to be 'pure'?

____________________________________________________


So...


You are "technically" out of being "In Nidd" however, you have just "had a go" but didn't offer a number, so you're back "In Nidd" again


[pre]

Q. PS When did you say the numbers had to be 'pure'?

[/pre]

A. In my last post



W**F


(the "conundrum number" move could be played here BTW)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...