Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If we would be amused, jrussell, by this thread on this other forum then why don't you post a link instead of being tiresome?


My understanding of Section 28 of the Copyright Act is that a journalist would be perfectly free to quote any of our ramblings on the forum under the umbrella of 'criticism and review'.


This allows the quoting of other work providing that...


The work has been made available to the public.

The source of the material is acknowledged.

The material quoted must be accompanied by some actual discussion or assessment (to warrant the criticism or review classification).

The amount of the material quoted is no more than is necessary for the purpose of the review.


Hence it doesn't make much difference if the forum is 'private', because the delivery of the content is such that it is publically available.


And it doesn't really matter whether or not people give 'permission' to a journalist. Ironically, if jrussel actually were a journalist and wanted to, s/he could actually quote this particular thread to show how hoity toity people get ;-)


It would probably be more embarrassing than anything we might have said in respose to such inane propositions as 'too many trees'


Conversely, those two websites half-inching content ARE in breach of copyright.


jrussell is undoubtedly guilty of appalling bad manners, and anyone who thinks that it's okay to 'experiment' on other people is sufferring from mental health problems whatever his/her flimsy justification.


For my two-penneth I think it's just another troll from a rather sad individual.

Mt Hugenot is absolutely right (and welcome back). Jrussel is just a tease (and not very bright one at that).....why on earth refer to a thread on another forum and then not say where it is so we can go and see. WIND UP OF THE WEEK I say......

Oh bother. DO we reckon JR's not sincere then?

Does this mean my observations about pasta playing an important role in establishing American-Italian Mafia based films and TV series as significant genre will not reach a wider audience?


Motherf*cker! I'm off out to find a telephone box to tear down.

There's far too much mindless vandalism to phone boxes in the area. I read this only the other day. Take care, Mr. H.


"Pleading Guilty to doing wilful damage to a telephone kiosk, CLAUD RUSSELL ALLEN, aged 69, an off-licence holder of Landcroft Road, East Dulwich, S.E., stated at Lambeth yesterday: "People kept pestering me for coppers for the telephone opposite my off-licence and I want to get the kiosk removed." Mr. D. Howells, for the G.P.O., said that at night Allen took a claw hammer into the kiosk, and, after smashing the electric bulb, tore away a hand set.


"Mr. P. Sutton, defending, said that Allen was suffering under a sense of grievance. The MAGISTRATE discharged Allen absolutely on payment of ?1 6s. 3d. damages and ?3 3s. costs." The Times, 17 Nov 1953

I never did get the point of beating up phone boxes but can't remember a time when it didn't happen.....that and urinating in them.


Yes Rosie...I seem to always mispell Hugenot...I wouldn't mind but that U key isn't near to the others so have no idea why I do it. Thinks to self 'must try harder in future'.

Sorry I haven't replied more promptly but things are very busy at the moment, what with trying to get my piece finished, and dealing with some unrest on a much bigger and busier board than this one.


The reason I can't link you to the thread I think you would be amused by is that that forum has very specific rules which disallow linking to or from other forums. The reason for this is that the moderators don't want what they call "board wars" which is something they have had problems with before.


In any case, when you read the piece (which should be out pretty soon!) you will be able to see the other places I have been posting nad check them out for yourselves.


It kind of amuses me that some of you think I'm still a "troll" and that this thread is a wind-up. I guess I did my job a bit too well! I'll enjoy seeing you backtrack when the article is published.

Dear God Jrussell stop patting yourself on the back - that's just embarrassing. I don't know whether you're a troll or not, as, to be perfectly honest none of your threads have drawn me in, so I haven't engaged with you. Your style does not appeal to me. But congratulating yourself of this ridiculous thread is cringe-worthy.

>It kind of amuses me that some of you think I'm still a "troll" and that this thread is a wind-up. I guess I did my job a >bit too well! I'll enjoy seeing you backtrack when the article is published.


Publishing something does not mean you are nor a troll...


>The reason I can't link you to the thread I think you would be amused by is that that forum has very specific rules which >disallow linking to or from other forums.


*Cough* so you follow some rules? Any reason you can't post the board name?

expat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >It kind of amuses me that some of you think I'm

> still a "troll" and that this thread is a wind-up.

> I guess I did my job a >bit too well! I'll enjoy

> seeing you backtrack when the article is

> published.

>

> Publishing something does not mean you are nor a

> troll..


+1


Shall we stop feeding the troll?

It's never a good idea to reply promptly anyway - especially when people are losing interest and starting to talk amongst themselves. No, you're better-off waiting until the thread has disappeared off the bottom of the page before bumping it back up; that way you don't shoot your bolt too early and then look a bit desperate by having to do it again later. But I guess you know all this anyway.



Nice bump though (massive cringe)

I know we should not feed the troll but for the people that are interested in copyright:


http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-other/c-exception.htm


Permitted uses of copyright works

You would not normally need to seek permission if you wish to use less

than a substantial part of a copyright protected work (see below for

information on the definition of "substantial part") . Additionally

there are a number of exceptions in copyright law which allow limited

use of copyright works without the permission of the copyright owner.

These can be found in the copyright sections of the Copyright Designs

and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) (1.27Mb)


Please note that this list is not exhaustive and particular care should

be taken if you intend to rely on an exception:


Non-commercial research and private study

Criticism, review and reporting current events

Teaching in educational establishments

Not for profit public playing of recorded music

Helping visually impaired people

Time shifting


Certain exceptions require you to give sufficient acknowledgment when

making use of a copyright protected work.


It is not an infringement of the copyright in a work if you draw, take a

photograph or make a film of, buildings or sculptures or works of

artistic craftsmanship which are located in a public places or in

premises open to the public.


Copyright is not infringed in any material when it is used in legal

proceedings.


Copyright is infringed where either the whole or a substantial part of a

work is used without permission, unless the copying falls within the

scope of one of the copyright exceptions.


A substantial part is not defined in copyright law but has been

interpreted by the courts to mean a qualitatively significant part of a

work even where this is not a large part of the work. Therefore, it is

quite likely that even a small portion of the whole work will still be a

substantial part.


All the other economic rights also apply where the whole or a

substantial part is to be used, but it is worth considering whether the

use falls within the scope of any of the copyright exceptions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...