Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is of particular interest to me currently, elsewhere. It's not unheard on the forum for less than 100% genuine posts/threads to be written/created. Due to my experience of using this forum I tend to be suspicious of these as Admin has found several of this nature in the past. I don't particularly want to feel like the eejet who will believe anything that's been written and am now perhaps too cynical. Do you have a view on this subject?
Declan, were you bothered about it when that bloke with the Spurious science on Diabetes or whatever it was posted up a cut and paste of a standard sales spiels with links to his book/website...and claimed he'd "just moved into the area" here? Many on here defended his blatant sales pitch (let alone his rubbish), I can't remember where you were on this? I'm cynical but on the whole find them quite a laugh. I think there should be a gallery of the best.

I think Narnia is referring to 1st time posters who are recommending something... that often ends up being connected to the poster.


Yes, first-time poster recommending anything should be taken with a pinch of salt. In any case, if they've never posted on EDF before, how are you to judge whether their recommendations are worth anything at all? They could be the type of people who - God forbid - sell their story to the News of the World and eat nothing but Bounty bars. B)

I highly recommend katie1997 gardening services (saturdays only).


For a huge fee, paid in advance directly to my bank account, I will promise not to go anywhere near your precious plants, shrubs, flowers, wildlife pond and vegetable patch*.


I am new to the area and this is my first post but I doubt you will find a more attractive - and effective - deal elsewhere. Winter discount coming soon!!!





*for their continued good health

Ah...Ok...thanks Quids/louisiana.


In that case...if people are posting fibs in order to obtain some sort of advantage - then that cannot be right (IMO). However, in the case of some "trolls", although I could slap them one for potentially wasting my time and/or possibly making a fool out of me, I do find that some of the resulting threads turn out to be a real hoot. We've had a couple of late - I laughed and laughed...priceless!

(Hi Katie1997)... I've used Katie1997 for several Saturdays now and found her deal very attractive. She may be slightly more expensive than other non gardening services but her attractiveness makes it worth it. In fact I'm thinking of posting about her in the 'People I like thread'. I can't wait for Winter.

The best one had to be the window cleaner pretending to be a happy customer recommending his company. The OP had the username of said company...remember that one?


Of course as window cleaners go, he wasn't a pathc on Katie's gardening services!

On a serious note narnia, yes I agree that first time postings for recommendations can appear to be suspicious but ... am sure that this is not always the intention or the case.


Sometimes someone may have been so enthused by the product/services, that they may have wished to share this as an expression of goodwill towards that business and to help others.


Tbh, sometimes recommendations from 'established' posters can be taken with a pinch of salt too as we are all so diverse, what one of us considers to be excellent (eg. Sunday lunch/coffee etc) may be far removed from our own opinion.



I take your point Katie but I would be more interested in hearing from someone who has posted for a while. A first time poster who starts a thread to recommend someone may be enthused by a product/service but not having anything else to read from that poster you don't know if they are genuine or not.

Seriously though, I have used quite a few people recommended from here...and I only used them because they had received many a recommendation from many an established poster. Two that stand out are Alex (for oven repairs) and Ludoscotts (seamstress).


Katie is right though in that in some cases (e.g. best coffee), it is a matter of opinion...I mean, it's all a bit subjective.


Bye the way, I too can recommend Katie7993 (or was is Katie 7132) for her services...




(PS: Katie2839...never mind your services, I hope you are applying your make-up at the moment!);-)

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The best one had to be the window cleaner

> pretending to be a happy customer recommending his

> company. The OP had the username of said

> company...remember that one?

>

> Of course as window cleaners go, he wasn't a pathc

> on Katie's gardening services!


My fave was the one (last month) who (it turned out) sold their story to the News of the World and ate nothing but Bounty bars, selling childcare. I think most people missed it as it was all happening in the About this forum section. But while Admin challenged with all the facts at his fingertips and let the whole thing run (several days), it was a hoot.

I'm always immediately suspicious of any low count recommendations and have been known to google whois etc to see if domain name owners are anything like user names, and I'm not shy of letting admin know.


Having said that have you ever been asked to recommend a business by its owner? As such I try to avoid steaming in. If I was a small local business and had a happy customer I may well ask them to recommend me on here, and if that was a new user then it may well look suspicious. I might even let them use my computer to log in and create their account and now it's the same IP address so looks really dodgy. I might even make some suggestions as to what they should say and now it looks really really dodgy, even though they volunteered to recommend me.


I guess I'm saying suspicion is natural but accusations can be harsh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...