Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's a bit tricky if it's an image. If it's a photo on a webpage then you can do a deeplink to it by pressing the insert image url thing, you can generally find an images url by right clicking it and viewing its propoerties.


If it's your own photo then it's a bit toughter. I generally post it on flickr as a private photo so that it doesn't clutter the photostream, then deeplink to it there.




that's me showing off now ;-P

You can always set up an account with Imageshack - it takes a couple of minutes and from there you can upload photos quite easily. http://www.imageshack.us


I too feel the warmth and a sudden wave of goodwill to all men (and women!). The flutter of peace on my face has redeemed my faith in human kind.


In the spirit of our new found nirvana I thought I'd finish off my little map and add East Duwlich (outline in black) and the Village/Central area and Common (circled in blue) so that there is an overall impression of where the areas relate.


http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/9910/allofdulwichdc1.jpg

http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/9910/allofdulwichdc1.013b5d9c88.jpg


Back in ye old days the entire manor of Dulwich incorporated roughly the area highlighted (although it was slightly smaller on the East part (I believe Lordship Lane was the dividing line) and on the West (Croxted Road was more or less the dividing line) and larger on the Southern part (extending into what are now Sydenham Hill and Duwlich and Sydenham Woods and reaching right up to Crystal Palace Park).

The harvester is where Lordship Lane and Dulwich Common intersect (Red and Black lines on the right). The concrete house is located just further along Lordship Lane where it meets London Road.


Mockney - I didn't mean to leave North Dulwich out but it's so small and is really a marketing ploy by estate agents. If anything it is really Herne Hill although I know that will irk anyone who lives there. Re: South Dulwich - there are only a few hundred people living in their large detached houses/private apartments and perhaps a thousand on the estate housing the old Kingswood house (below)


http://img107.imageshack.us/img107/6522/kingswoodqy4.jpg


http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/1434/kingswood1ie0.jpg


beyond that there is more greenery (i.e. Dulwich and Sydenham Woods) than concrete. The local church St Stephens states its address as South Dulwich.


http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/9875/ststephenschurchto9.jpg



As said before it is often referred to as West Dulwich or on its extremeties as Gipsy Hill.

That's because this whole part of Dulwich was wooded and the separation of Sydenham and Dulwich far more pronounced. So the station was called Sydenham Hill to mark its location to the rest of Dulwich i.e. on the approach to Sydenham Hill in a clearing in Dulwich Woods http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/southwark/dulwich/sydenham-hill-station.htm . But if you take Dulwich to be the land owned by the Dulwich estate it is more Dulwich than all the areas on the east of Lordship Lane which were originally part of Friern Manor Farm.

And in addition taken from St Stephens website: History


Built 1867 - 75; consecrated 1868

Architect; Banks and Barry

Listed Grade II


In 1868, only a handful of people lived in the leafy part of Surrey now known as Dulwich, on a few dairy farms and in modern gracious villas.


St. Stephen, in the woods on College Road, a beautiful neo-gothic church, was commissioned from the famous Victorian architect, Sir Charles Barry, to seat a congregation of seven hundred. The church was built by private subscription without endowments, and with the extra gift of a fresco by Sir Edward Poynter


Their website proclaims South Dulwich at the top: http://www.ststephensdulwich.org/history.html and so does a history of one house on College Road "Dunlica" (now St John's Wood house) which reads


A tall, old-looking detached house on College Rd (pleasant road which runs between Dulwich College and a park), Dulwich (the S end, this location also described as in "South Dulwich"), SC London (London SE21).


http://humphrysfamilytree.com/OMeara/dunlica.html

:))>>The harvester is where Lordship Lane and Dulwich Common intersect (Red and Black lines on the right). The concrete >>house is located just further along Lordship Lane where it meets London Road. <<


Oh yes I did realise that. I meant that from the map and according to the borders added they appear not to be in either East Dulwich or West Dulwich....so where are they?

As said this is only a rough outline - I knew I should have put a disclaimer up! Re electoral wards - they never match be they in Dulwich or Dundee. Just depends on which governing party needs the votes titled in their favour. 'Most' of the old Dulwich constituency was merged with West Norwood to form what we know today but that still leaves out Peckham Rye, South Camberwell ward and parts of The Lanes which went over to Peckham and Camberwell ward. The current Dulwich and West Norwood ward acquired parts of Thurlow Park, Herne Hill and Coldharbour from Streatham and Vauxhall ward.

Here's something over in West Dulwich - there's a family centre in Chatsworth Baptist Church, I took my little boy over to a parent and child group there today. Pretty good. Took ten minutes from my place in ED and I drove past loads of beautiful houses in the tree lined streets over that way just wishing that ED housing stock was as well-built. But however nice it is, it is not East Dulwich - it's too quiet, too...too...suburban. Is it simply because it's south of the South Circular?


citizen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...