Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OMG. They'd have to shop in .... Peckham!!!

>

> I hope the snotty Bestards who are keen on

> socio-economic cleansing all become jobless or

> bankrupt and have to sell up and move to Croydon.



At least they'd have Waitrose and M&S in Croydon.

I'm not a snob, have lived in the area for 29 years except for 1 year when I moved away but have come back to good old South East London and love it, I don't think Iceland is unsuitable for East Dulwich but I would never shop there. I haven't been into an Iceland since I was about 7yrs old and dragged there by my Mum and from what I remember it was all frozen junk food but I may be wrong now, perhaps I will pop in and see how it's changed! I do an Ocado shop because they do Tesco price match and I can't always be bothered to drive to the Beckenham branch of Waitrose. Generally the choice of food is much better in Waitrose and for someone who cooks a lot I can never get all the ingredients I need in Sainsburys also it's a less stressful shop in Waitrose for many reasons. My suggestion would be to leave Iceland where it is for the people who want and replace Foxtons with a Waitrose!
I totally agree with DJKQ, there are some people on low income in ED that might shop at Iceland I myself like to mix and match my shops nothing wrong with that ED it not just for the middle classes to decide what shops should be here, my grandparents came here in the 50s from the Caribbean no doubt there are others to all over ED if anybody should have any objections is that generation.

barryrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please please please. Can it be turned into a

> whole foods market, it's the right size like

> fresh and wild in soho. That would be awesome.

> Iceland is not right for the area


xxxxxxxxxxxx


Oh FFS :)):)):))


If you want an area without an Iceland in it, f**k off somewhere else :))

McCatllar Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The wine is actually more expensive than most

> supermarkets...Lidl is the best for cheap wine,

> and some of it is decent.


xxxxxxxx


Eh? Three bottles for a tenner? Don't think "most supermarkets" can beat that :)


I think Iceland's wine is fine for the price - it's cheap plonk obviously, but it's not undrinkable.


Lidl might be OK but having to trek down to the bottom of Bellenden Road to get there is not much fun unless you live in that direction.


ETA: I once had some sort of fake Baileys from Lidl, and it was absolutely disgusting.

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only Primark I know is the one in Peckham. I

> don't consider its shopfront to be good looking.

> It's just glass isn't it?


Did you know that in Primark you are not actually permitted to buy things? You are only to take them off the shelf, have a look at them and then throw them on the ground with the hanger or try and force them back into the middle of the pile you took them off, messing everything up ;)

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually Sue Iceland now charge ?12 for 3 bottles.

> I know this isn't a wine thread but recently I got

> a dozen bottles of red from Laithwaites online

> which worked out cheaper than that and the wines

> were delicious.


xxxxxx


what wines were they?


Don't ever join Naked Wines, rip-off disguised as charitable enterprise for budding winemakers.

According to recent tv adds,Waitrose is no more expensive than Tesco for named brands.


That's food for thought! To be honest Iceland always seems half empty and I woudn't be a bit surprised if it does close down. Lets face it most people in ED would like to see the back of shops like that. Its just plain snobbery.

"To be honest Iceland always seems half empty and I woudn't be a bit surprised if it does close down. Lets face it most people in ED would like to see the back of shops like that."


Who are 'most people in ED'? Would these be the people who have lived her since before LL started to get tarted up or those who moved in because of it? It's clear that enough people do shop there or it simply wouldn't be there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...