Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay, I'll do it.


The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.


This is because the additional 2.5% is added to the pre VAT price of the product, which is 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay, I'll do it.

>

> The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound

> store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.

>

> This is because the additional 2.5% is added to

> the pre VAT price of the product, which is

> 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.



Brilliant - could not have put it better mysekf. I was itching to do it though.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So that would then mean 2.1277 less pence per unit

> to the supplier which would trickle down to lower

> wages in the factories of India whaere the goods

> are made?


No.

What Mick may be saying is that VAT is a tax which at whatever rate it is goes to the government. Anyone registered for VAT is acting as a tax collector and nothing else. So the price per unit remains the same. However, with the additional tax, less units may be sold.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't imagine that much in a pound shop is zero rated, apart from razor blades


Ah. I was thinking of the 99p shops. Different kettle of fish, maybe. Fair bit of edible stuff. All pretty straightforward. ;) http://customs.hmrc.gov.uk/channelsPortalWebApp/channelsPortalWebApp.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=pageLibrary_PublicNoticesAndInfoSheets&propertyType=document&columns=1&id=HMCE_CL_000118#P67_4124

ST&NLY Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just heard from my friend who works for the estate

> agency Alan & Hansen that Poundland have a temp

> permit for 2 years to run their business in

> Lordship lane.

-------------------------------------------


From the horses mouth..


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/Alan_hansen_in_2004.JPG


" Poundland have a temp permit for 2 years to run their business in Lordship lane. "


I thank you



W**F

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gosh, no you're right. I've just been to

> Poundland's website and they do stock a lot of

> food.

>

> I always thought they were just bric-a-brac

> stores. I was thinking of that place on LL where

> they sell lots of plasstic buckets.


A J Farmers - 'where you can buy absolutely everything for absolutely nothing.' as jimmy nesbitt once said to me. (oh yes he did...)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Okay, I'll do it.

> >

> > The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound

> > store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.

> >

> > This is because the additional 2.5% is added to

> > the pre VAT price of the product, which is

> > 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.

>

>

> Brilliant - could not have put it better mysekf. I

> was itching to do it though.



Lol how Anal are you lot!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder how much the rebranding is costing in total?  Could the money be used in a better way ? 
    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...