Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay, I'll do it.


The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.


This is because the additional 2.5% is added to the pre VAT price of the product, which is 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay, I'll do it.

>

> The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound

> store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.

>

> This is because the additional 2.5% is added to

> the pre VAT price of the product, which is

> 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.



Brilliant - could not have put it better mysekf. I was itching to do it though.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So that would then mean 2.1277 less pence per unit

> to the supplier which would trickle down to lower

> wages in the factories of India whaere the goods

> are made?


No.

What Mick may be saying is that VAT is a tax which at whatever rate it is goes to the government. Anyone registered for VAT is acting as a tax collector and nothing else. So the price per unit remains the same. However, with the additional tax, less units may be sold.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't imagine that much in a pound shop is zero rated, apart from razor blades


Ah. I was thinking of the 99p shops. Different kettle of fish, maybe. Fair bit of edible stuff. All pretty straightforward. ;) http://customs.hmrc.gov.uk/channelsPortalWebApp/channelsPortalWebApp.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=pageLibrary_PublicNoticesAndInfoSheets&propertyType=document&columns=1&id=HMCE_CL_000118#P67_4124

ST&NLY Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just heard from my friend who works for the estate

> agency Alan & Hansen that Poundland have a temp

> permit for 2 years to run their business in

> Lordship lane.

-------------------------------------------


From the horses mouth..


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/Alan_hansen_in_2004.JPG


" Poundland have a temp permit for 2 years to run their business in Lordship lane. "


I thank you



W**F

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gosh, no you're right. I've just been to

> Poundland's website and they do stock a lot of

> food.

>

> I always thought they were just bric-a-brac

> stores. I was thinking of that place on LL where

> they sell lots of plasstic buckets.


A J Farmers - 'where you can buy absolutely everything for absolutely nothing.' as jimmy nesbitt once said to me. (oh yes he did...)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Okay, I'll do it.

> >

> > The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound

> > store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.

> >

> > This is because the additional 2.5% is added to

> > the pre VAT price of the product, which is

> > 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.

>

>

> Brilliant - could not have put it better mysekf. I

> was itching to do it though.



Lol how Anal are you lot!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...