Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay, I'll do it.


The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.


This is because the additional 2.5% is added to the pre VAT price of the product, which is 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay, I'll do it.

>

> The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound

> store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.

>

> This is because the additional 2.5% is added to

> the pre VAT price of the product, which is

> 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.



Brilliant - could not have put it better mysekf. I was itching to do it though.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So that would then mean 2.1277 less pence per unit

> to the supplier which would trickle down to lower

> wages in the factories of India whaere the goods

> are made?


No.

What Mick may be saying is that VAT is a tax which at whatever rate it is goes to the government. Anyone registered for VAT is acting as a tax collector and nothing else. So the price per unit remains the same. However, with the additional tax, less units may be sold.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't imagine that much in a pound shop is zero rated, apart from razor blades


Ah. I was thinking of the 99p shops. Different kettle of fish, maybe. Fair bit of edible stuff. All pretty straightforward. ;) http://customs.hmrc.gov.uk/channelsPortalWebApp/channelsPortalWebApp.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=pageLibrary_PublicNoticesAndInfoSheets&propertyType=document&columns=1&id=HMCE_CL_000118#P67_4124

ST&NLY Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just heard from my friend who works for the estate

> agency Alan & Hansen that Poundland have a temp

> permit for 2 years to run their business in

> Lordship lane.

-------------------------------------------


From the horses mouth..


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/Alan_hansen_in_2004.JPG


" Poundland have a temp permit for 2 years to run their business in Lordship lane. "


I thank you



W**F

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gosh, no you're right. I've just been to

> Poundland's website and they do stock a lot of

> food.

>

> I always thought they were just bric-a-brac

> stores. I was thinking of that place on LL where

> they sell lots of plasstic buckets.


A J Farmers - 'where you can buy absolutely everything for absolutely nothing.' as jimmy nesbitt once said to me. (oh yes he did...)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Okay, I'll do it.

> >

> > The additional 2.5% on VAT would turn a pound

> > store into at 102.1277 pence store, not 102.5.

> >

> > This is because the additional 2.5% is added to

> > the pre VAT price of the product, which is

> > 85.10638p, not the inclusive price of 100p.

>

>

> Brilliant - could not have put it better mysekf. I

> was itching to do it though.



Lol how Anal are you lot!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...