Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It really could do with an indoor public swimming

> pool. I feel London is generally under catered for

> when it comes to indoor pools.


There's one 100 yds away from it!!!....you don't like to travel too far do you ;-) Of course it is dire, but you didn't express any requirements of a certain standard of hygiene! ;-)

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know about the East Dulwich Baths I just think

> the area could do with another one as there are

> significantly more people living here now that

> there were 100 years ago.


But, can they all swim?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know about the East Dulwich Baths I just think

> the area could do with another one as there are

> significantly more people living here now that

> there were 100 years ago.


But that one is never full up, of people I mean, so why build another? Also, now as we're more mobile "the local baths" is not necessarily the place the locals swim. (If they have any sense...)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay, so it's a smoking/gambling/cheesy disco/lap

> dancing/porn shop/shooting range/guitar

> studio/record shop/opium den... I want to live

> there!


I already do...sounds like my flat.>:D<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
    • Do great pizzas there at community cafe.. lots going on — was free parking but plans  to like everywhere get folk to pay.  Nice area… only discovered it a few years ago..   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...