Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Birds, lizards and other animals eat live insects by the bucket loads. And if your house was infested with cockroaches, what would you do about it? In fact that's a good question to Aquarius. There are actually very few live insects eaten on the show. I eat more insects every time I open my mouth to breath when cycling.

Why do they have to eat a Kangaroo or Crocodile penis? surely if you were in a situation where you had hunted and killed a Crocodile or a Kangaroo the last thing on my mind would be to eat its nut sack or penis.


Incidentally the food critic drama queen made me laugh, why go on a show where one of the main features involves getting up close and personal with bugs if you have a phobia? she must have known? I think shes giving a bad account of herself, is she mental?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> She is more than mental. And extremely litigious

>

> She thinks plants can photosynthesise in a human

> stomache for example

>

> discussion about her from a couple of years back


Kerayzee.


Entertaining none the less.

I think that they should lock Gillian in a big box of slime and force her to eat Iceland party food! I am loving watching her collapse with shock at the thought of a fly when she examines peoples poo for fun.


Did anyone else enjoy Limpoldarmpit momentarily believing that Linford was agreeing that steeling ?100 from the taxpayers purse was so tiny that it didnt count because he paid it back anyhow? I want Linford to bitch slap Limpoldarmpit with his lunchbox.

Apparently she's one of the reserves but sounds like she'll be going in soon. And already we have our first quoute.


"One moment I was in my bath in Camberwell, the next I was at Heathrow"


Perhaps we should guess at what other local references she will fit in.


"It's not like swimming in the pool at JAGS"

"Ooh what I'd give for a William Rose sauasage"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...