Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, SMG, I feel it only proved my point.


I don't think this thread is anything about sexuality at all.


I think it's about a few people seeing how far they can push it before someone 'says' something.


When they get the reaction, they launch into a man-hating rant. First IV with some scarcely concealed misandry about climaxing, and then DJKQ tossing subtelty out of the window.


The goal wasn't self-expression, it was conflict. It's only fun, like the 'lesbian' thread, when it's being tested for *shock* value. As soon as it becomes humdrum the attention seekers will drop it like an old rag.

Whatever H....give it a break eh? You are like a broken record...and just no damn fun.


You are right the thread isn't about sexuality...it's about a 'rampant rabbit'. You are the only one turning it into yet another tiresome attempt to have a go at me. Typical arrogance from H...thinks he is the all knowing authority on why people post what they post, or start the threads they do.

I think DJKQ's cross because she believes that my disapproval of threads about masturbation aids is somehow a criticism of women or lesbians.


There's nothing I can say to change that.


The irony is that I only took the mickey out of attention seeking behaviour. On the other hand she started attacking men for being paedos and rapists.


She's been incredibly insulting and sexist, and in response she's merely been chastised for preening.

That pure fantasy on your part H......and now you are insulting me with your typical arrogance.


I really think you have a real issue with women having any kind of fun don't you H. Anyway hopefully someone H doesn't see fit to insult will return this thread back to the fun banter it was before Mr Misery stepped in.

:))


Watch this one...


Me: "I think DJKQ's cross because she believes that my disapproval of threads about masturbation aids is somehow a criticism of women"


DJKQ: "That pure fantasy on your part H......I really think you have a real issue with women"


Badaam, tish.


I kind of think my sexuality is my own buiness, thank you for your assumptions, but I have no intention of resolving them one way or the other in public.


I don't think sexuality is something that's undeserving of discussion, but I think it's such an intense private issue that it's best kept to more secluded environments. After all, I don't come on here talking about my favourite poo do I?


I don't actually think that vaginas are intrinsically funny - the only way they could be fun is through the giggly *shock* of breaking a social taboo.


Breaking that taboo doesn't have long time hilarity value, it's funny the first time, and then you have to find something to shock more. This conversation started with accessories, and then stooped to a rather uninspired reference to discharges. That kind of escalation is typical of *shock* tactics.

Oh please, this is a thread about an adult toy. That is all. Some posts may have been borderline what one would normally expect on a local community forum, and others outside some people's comfort zone (including myself), but what's with all the faux social commentary?


Whatever the historical precedent for patriarchy, there's every evidence that in the modern era women are overcompensating with a complete rejection of social decorum.


Let's assume for argument's sake that women are completely rejecting 'social decorum', where is the evidence that they are doing so to overcompensate? And overcompensate for what? Living in a patriarchal society? Well thanks Freud, but you're probably better off leaving your armchair psychology at home, no one is that envious of your pen.


I'm guessing this thread is here because of a social weakness.


I'm guessing you're here because of a social weakness. See where guessing gets us, H?


an insecurity with sexuality that means women need to keep stating it to complete strangers... "I have a vagina"


Oh there's that armchair psychology again. Tell us again why women do things, go on H, it's not partonising at all and you're doing incredibly well so far.


*normally places winky icon here, but other people's vehemence seem to have deprived me of the pleasure*


If you're referring to my earlier post, I'm not depriving you of anything. I simply reiterated an observation made by other forum members, namely that placing a winking or smiling icon at the end of an inflammatory/nasty comment does not make it seem any less so. If anything, it just makes the poster look smug. But in future don't let me or anyone else stop you. After all, you've nothing to lose. And don't you think that saying you would have posted the icon versus actually posting the icon amounts to the same thing anyway?

I think some women can be much ruder then men! Dirty mares some of you can be!

can make a builder blush!.

I think this is a great thread talking about a adult toy for ladies fun.

Would there be the same negative comments if a guy was asking about what type of

fleshlight to use?...google it!

stop slagging off djkiller queen its all fun!.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think some women can be much ruder then men!

> Dirty mares some of yoy can be!

> can make a builder blush!.


Haha, don't pretend to be coy CS, I've read your posts in the 'a joke' thread.

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think some women can be much ruder then men!

> > Dirty mares some of yoy can be!

> > can make a builder blush!.

>

> Haha, don't pretend to be coy CS, I've read your

> posts in the 'a joke' thread.


I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I am a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it

what I cannot stand is people who are up their own arse pretending that they have never heard a rude

joke in their life acting all shocked and offended!.

given that people on here are saying they're so confident about their this/that, some reactions suggest the opposite.

example - if you're confident about your religion you don't get shirty about it when people question or poke fun at it.

There will always be disrespecters.

There's been a few amateurish comments on here from, presumably, men (given the banality of the comments) - i think some men are genuinely threatened by the fact that women also have sexual needs (no way !!!), often exceeding yer average man's, and are ready to sort themselves out, in spite of/as well as having a partner already. sort of like it trash's the man's idea of being the all-vanquishing supercock (though never 'quite' achieving it). get real and grow up.

But really, who cares.


Basically 'people toss', big feckin deal.


is the 'rampant rabbit' oriented part of the thread truly over ? If so why not start another thread maybe called 'sexuality points to prove' because this one is surely off topic now.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I am

> a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it


Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!


I haven't been offended by anything on this thread. I will admit to being a bit shocked though. Not at the content, but at the context more than anything else.

a thread about female masturbation and masturbation tools was always going to attract controversy.


If I started a thread about my wonderful squidgy mega-vag that comes in a can and is heated up in warm water and about how I have squirty orgasms (every time no less) I think there might be some pretty vocal opposition from both sexes.


I have enjoyed this thread though and haven't been offended at all.


:)

It was always intended to be nothing more than a bit of cheeky fun and I think most people have had fun with it.


But sadly for me, I have so many recommendations to choose from now that I am no closer to answering the question in my original post! :))

The individual sexuality of a person is indeed a private things should they want it to be (with obvious exceptions involving public life hypocrisy etc) but the sexuality of a entire gender is up for debate. One of the things I have noted about when women get together and discuss sex, is the level of confirmation and questioning involved, if layered with humour and sometime vulgarity. Women have to continously ask themselves am I normal because of the stereotypes that we are spoonfed on a daily basis and which is getting worse. Porn is much more mainstream now and hell that is a lot to live up to. Female nudity of a very specific type is everywhere - again its a lot to live up to. Women talk to normal women to reconfirm that their desires, their needs, their bodies are normal because film, magazines and some, not all men have a really skewed view.

felt-tip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> a thread about female masturbation and

> masturbation tools was always going to attract

> controversy.


Yeah! When do we get the 'Men - How do you like to masturbate" thread? Will it be considered too close to the bone? And how long before the admin pulls it?


Fnarr. :))

I don't like cricket. Don't see the point of it. Dull dull dull. So, here's the thing; I don't go on the cricket thread. Never ever. Why would I?


In that vein, I suggest that anyone who finds anything offensive about this thread doesn't come here. Sex toys for women, female orgasm; out of some people's comfort zones. So if you find it all very shocking best stick to what you like.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
    • The tissues would absorb secretions from your nose.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...