Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The grandparenting thread has made me think about Christmas with extended family / in-laws. Anyone have any tips to minimise stress?


This year we'll be self-catering with Mr Smiler's family (two old ladies, eight adults, two toddlers and two tiny babies) for a whole week. Not done this since the bleak farm-house-hovel Xmas of 2008 when the beast of Exmoor would have been a welcome diversion. This time cannot pursue my usual strategy of getting drunk the whole time as am breast-feeding.


My plan so far is:


- not to be the one who runs around after everyone in a dutiful way (demented hostess mode) and then seethes with resentment. Do as little as possible while seeming to be helpful (e.g. offer drinks when everyone has one already, hover in the kitchen when others are cooking).


- to keep chocolate / trashy books / ipod in a bedroom and go there frequently (say the baby is awake, needs feeding etc.).


- phone a friend to bitch about our respective in-laws.


Any tips appreciated!

I could do with some tips too. Am taking my mother in law who's over from Australia, to spend Christmas with my family. The problem - my mother in law is very quiet and doesn't drink, whereas my family can barely stand by lunchtime thanks to my stepfather's cocktail making skills. Throw in a new baby, two toddlers and my auntie's odd lodger who bores everyone with his stories about cars and I think we have a fantastic Christmas in the making!
Go out for a walk...cabin fever always sparks the biggest rows. Also make sure everyone has something to do and take loads of games. Also maybe all agree some boundaries/rules....dinner is served at a specific time and set up a rota of cooking/cleaning. Good luck.....my family drive me potty and my reserve is to hide somewhere with a bottle of wine!

Surely because you are breastfeeding, you'll be too tired to do any cooking, cleaning, washing up at all? Just sit back and make everyone wait on you.

Similarly - lots of breaks to bedroom to "feed baby" or even to "have a lie down", with book, ipod, hidden stash of chocolates.

hehe great thread


I've recently developed a real need for long baths to sooth something or other, it always tends to come on when visiting relatives!


At the inlaws we do quite well, there are normally so many of them at Christmas, that after a few drinks you can wander off on your own for several hours before anyone realises you've gone!


K

Just read a good tip in Good Housekeeping (promise not my usual read!).


Write the Christmas chores (that you'd be comfortable with someone else doing) on scraps of paper and put them in a hat. Each guest has to pick a chore out of a hat. Bit of a game and it keeps them busy/useful.


Think I'll def. be trying that one!

I'm going to need to find evidence that:

1. a hammock is not bad for a baby's back

2. babies do not need to sleep all the time

3. breastfeeding two children is not going to harm anybody


so that I can back myself up!


I'm sure there's more- need to prepare....

Haha Helen so true! I get from my MIL that she feels she doesn't really know her grandson because he 'sleeps a lot'. Total rot, he has about 2 hours in total in the day in 2 naps, oh and that he is needy because he is breastfed :X


Can I just ask, do you think it is ok for me to insist that this year we have a christmas at home without visitors? For the last 15 years I have gone back to my husbands family for Christmas (my lot are hopeless/all over the place/not bothered about xmas), and last year they came to ours - it was the worst Christmas I've ever had. I was 8 months pregnant, had toddler as well, did so much cooking and they didn't lift a finger. In fact they were deliberately lazy and unhelpful because we didn't go back to theirs (MIL loves a mind game). Anyway, this year I've said to my husband I want Christmas and Boxing day at home and then we will hit the road and go back to his parents (2.5hrs away) and visit some of my lot. Is that fair? My hubby is in a grump about it because he wants to go back home.....I'm knackered with 2 kids under 2 and not slept for more than a few hours in about a year and just want to kick back and relax with my immediate family. Is anyone else staying at home with just the kids and then visiting family? Hubby keeps making me feel like I am being unreasonable :(

Poor you Gussy, you are not being unreasonable at all. Every other year with the in-laws is more than enough for me (and vice versa for Mr Smiler with my family)! Tell him to stop whinging (or put him on here and we will!) >:D<


Poor Helen GV - there seems to be a big anti-breastfeeding thing with older generations, like we're choosing to breastfeed as a deliberate ploy to exclude everyone else. Grrr.


Anyone got a good response to endless "bitty" jokes?!

Since we had our daughter we didn't go to either family but stayed at home - so much better. Gussy, definitely tell him you're not going anywhere! Also a chance to establish your own family traditions (not that that is likely to work with your MIL as a reason why you're not there!). Hope to see you in the park on Christmas Day!

Gussy - we're doing exactly that this year, we've never had christmas in our own home, or even in London, we always end up trying to go to both sets of family and slots in grandparents too (Surrey, Devon, Glos) spemd the whole time on trains or stuck in traffic, lugging massive bags around and getting exhusted. We're putting our feet down this year and it'll be just the 3 of us on Christmas day!


K

Have had this a couple of times, haven't retorted but maybe

'haha that NEVER gets old does it'

or 'as long as he's potty trained by the time he goes away to uni'


my in-laws speak French and I don't so luckily I miss a lot of criticism anyway, blissful ignorance...


>

> Anyone got a good response to endless "bitty"

> jokes?!

> Write the Christmas chores (that you'd be

> comfortable with someone else doing) on scraps of

> paper and put them in a hat. Each guest has to

> pick a chore out of a hat. Bit of a game and it

> keeps them busy/useful.


...and mark the chore you want and offer to pick from the hat first.

We stayed at home, just the (then) 3 of us for Christmas a couple of years back - thought it would be nice/ good to start own traditions etc. To be honest, I thought it was a bit sad and dull. I think I'd rather spend an imperfect day with whomever's family/ friends/ random collections of people than staying on our own. But, then again, I quite like my family on both sides. Even if the in laws do feed me strange English Christmas food (prawn cocktail: vom!) and sickly sweet German wine.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...