Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hope in the Christmas period we may get to go to restaurants more often than normal, or even to go to restaurants that we would not normally get the chance to go to.


If anyone wants to discuss restaurants in London, you can do it here.


Last night I went to Langans with work. I first went there with a girlfriend nearly 20 years ago when it was probably a cool place to go but now it seems the average age there is 50ish or a bit more. But it was very nice and with a small group from work, we had a great time. Most diners were formally dressed and more than half wore ties which was rather surprising I thought.


Food 8

Service 8

Atmosphere 7

Value 8


They still have Michael Caine on the menu. I'm not sure if he still owns a bit of it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/14650-the-christmas-restaurant-review/
Share on other sites

I was treated to lunch recently at Odins just off Marylebone Lane. Its part of the Langan family. Great artwork on the wall. Food was delicious - crab souffle to start and calves liver to follow. I think the set unch is about ?25 for two courses - bargain!
I love the understated gentility of Marleybone. I'd live there if I had the dosh. The Golden Hind (100 odd years old) and The Sea Shell are also up there. And then it also has a gem of a local boozer that still feels like a pub should do......with an old piano player playing 3 nights a week.
Oh sorry... restaurants. We really enjoyed Viajante the other day. An interesting and unique menu, with diverse influences. It has been accused of being pretentious - and some of the waiters were wearing daft art-student clothes - but the food was fantastic, and we both loved it. There's a very nice little bar there too, with reasonable-ish prices.

Recently I've been to:


Bistro Bruno Loubet. Very cool and relaxed, food was good but not amazing but a lovely evening full of Clerkenwell chatter; and


Bob Bob Ricard. Such fun! Take the girls. Press the champagne button. Act like a tool. I loved it; and


Hawksmoor. Put down your copy of Men's Health, alpha-males; today is a naughty day. Extra session on the Ergo tomorrow, mind. Great but damned expensive.


St John Bread and Wine. I just love it here. Simple and excellent - and a nicer room than Smithfields I reckon.

I recently treated my better half to dinner at Galvin La Chapelle. Definitely only for high days and holidays at those prices but beautiful food in a fantastic setting. The overall experience topped off by the wonderful, foodie staff who couldn't have been more helpful or charming - including giving us a great table but with a view of the pass so he could see into the kitchen (which he loved).

I loved Galvin La Chapelle also, pricey but worth it - feels like you've been out for a special treat vs. an over-priced meal.


Having a french other half, I do find a rather large proportion of our budget goes on eating out, and hence have been lucky enough to eat at some top restaurants. My opinions (others may disagree):

Didn't like Gordon Ramsey's flagship restaurant - service too intrusive, food far too rich, felt like someone's living room (that was years ago though).

Also went to Petrus but after Marcus Wareing took over (can't remember the new name) food was far too salty and service a bit meh.

Le Gavroche - love it. Totally old school and kitch, but guaranteed a fabulous time.

The Waterside Inn at Bray - my eyes still water at the bill, but everything was fantastic. Would highly recommend for a special treat (although not London, I know)

Joel Robuchon - fun, very tasty food. Not particularly relaxing or formal, if that's what you're going for

Maze - too frantic, food weird instead of fun. Like a bad Joel Robuchon.

I love a restuarant called Min Jiang in Kensington (pre-order the duck), fantastic views over London so best to go in the day. Not much atmosphere though.

The Square - impeccable service, food a little salty for my taste


Actually, we're looking for somewhere new to try for a lunch between Christmas and NY (we do that instead of presents - see what I mean about the food budget) so if anyone has any suggestions I'd be grateful too.

I haven't been to Galvin at Windows, I'd love to hear what that's like.


When I went to Maze I had something like a deconstructed BLT which was awful in so many ways, perhaps that's what stuck in my mind - and because it was close to when I went to Joel Robuchon where they did this little layered soup thing which was much nicer, perhaps I remember it even more. Hmm going to quickly check the menu to remind myself...


... oh it's changed quite a bit, it was a bit more 'out there' when I went there. Personally I prefer my 'cheese on toast three ways' to Maze. Weird vibe as well, maybe because it was a Sunday lunchtime before the financial world crashed.

Went to Goodmans with work a few months ago. The Chilean wagyu ribeye special was certainly the best steak I have ever had. Good selection of starters as well. The tempura king prawns with mango salsa were surprisingly nice, consideing it is a steak house. Also recommend the Goodmans ribeye.


Highly recommend The Ledbury. They used to serve one of the best value lunches in town. For 22.5 you could get 3 beautifully cooked courses. Hmm the soffule was to die for... I think they have put the price up to 33.5 now. The dishes are classic, but creative at the same time. Service has always been excellent for both lunch and dinner.

LadyTaTa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven't been to Galvin at Windows, I'd love to

> hear what that's like.


The food is very good, the cooking was hard to fault. Fantastic view. But it's a pretty typical London fine dining menu... sometimes these places can seem a little deja-vu. Foie gras terrine, ballotines of stuff, a puree here, a foam there. Guaranteed formula for a Michelin star. Lovely to eat, but nothing new.

Went to Hakkasan last week for lunch (I was not paying). We had failed to get into any of the good restaurants in Charlotte Street (all fully booked) so I was surprised to see that there were only a few tables occupied at Hakkasan during the whole of the lunch service (and we stayed a long time!). The sevice was very good but I have to say I was a bit disappointed with the food, some of which was really not much better than you can get locally. I would not put it anywhere near the top of my list which is currently headed by The Square in Bruton Street.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of Smoke Control law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all per se, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...