Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mancity68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm a Peckham dweller so have always used this

> office. You get to know when it's busy so avoid

> those times. Usually, getting there at 8 on a

> Saturday is a safe bet for a short wait.

> Today.....45 minute wait. When I left at 845 the

> queue was to the car park railings.

>

> Four counter staff working and they were being as

> quick and efficient as they could be but crikey

> this is an astonishing level of demand for them to

> deal with.

>

> Other impact I've noticed since the change is the

> significant increase in Royal Mail van traffic on

> the adjacent roads - and the increase in traffic

> due to ED callers. Not a criticism of the drivers,

> appreciate it's quite a distance to come. Just

> curious to know what the local area impact

> analysis was when they decided to increase the

> role of the Peckham office.


Thanks for this! MP Helen Hayes got in touch with me and I've sent her over an email summarising the issues that have been listed above. Hopefully, that will help put some weight on Royal Mail to sort out the issues.

Currently standing in an extraordinarily long queue outside the Peckham sorting office. Whoever thought this was an acceptable thing to do was seriously misguided. A very large number of people waiting in excess of an hour to collect parcels - many of which were Home when the attempted delivery took place - postmen didn?t even knock!


Postmen are fed up with it as are the public - I?ve alrwady spent over ?2 on parking having spent 15 minutes driving around to find a pay parking space.... I?m likely to have to top it up.


I?ve no idea what elderly residents in East Dulwich are going to do and am dreading the dark, cold, wet winters as I can?t see this improving - even the postmen and staff are saying it?s a complete joke and totally unfair on all....

Something needs to change.... mind you

Royal Mail have sold Silvester Road for an apparent ?7 million so I doubt they give two hoots...

I was assured a parcel was arriving at my house by Thursday at the latest so someone has been IN for 3 days just in case it came- NO SIGN of it despite seeing 3 red vans parked up at one time or another today and a bewildered looking postman who I have never seen before trying to find a house (even though they are all numbered!)

I was thinking about the logistics of just adding the whole catchment area of Sylvester Road, and given the wealth of the people in the neighbourhood who will spend a lot online- they have bitten off more than they can chew, that's for sure!

The posties were very much against the move so several left which is possibly one of the many reasons things have gone pear shaped. I saw a parcel delivery man today trying to deliver parcels to houses with no luck so I rushed out and told him to leave the parcels with me. One has now been collected by a very grateful neighbour! The van driver said that he was also supposed to deliver normal post to my road but that he wouldn?t have time!

At that meeting I got the impression from the union rep that the postmen weren't sorry at the prospect of no longer working at Silvester Rd - that the only thing they would miss was the easy parking. The union rep was anticipating that conditions would be better for the postmen at Peckham and this is similar to what he told Southwark News.

Southwark News reported in July last year:-

"The decision to close the Silvester Road branch, and the building to be sold, came after months of campaigning from locals, Labour Party members and the Communication Workers Union (CWU).

The company has sought to assure residents that their door-to-door postal services will not be affected, and no jobs will be lost.


But Steve Beadle, CWU rep for south east London, told the News it was a ?complicated? scenario.

?The conditions of the Silvester Road branch really aren?t fit for purpose, the building is very antiquated,? he said.

?The move would be good for my members. But the one massive issue we?ve got is that this area would lose its enquiry office. What we say as a union and to the local community is they still need to provide an independent enquiry office within SE22...."


https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/royal-mail-confirms-east-dulwich-sorting-office-will-move-peckham-january/

Fed Ex, DHL etc leave parcels with neighbours if nobody is in. I don't think Royal Mail does this but why not?


I presume they would argue that it might add to their posties' workload but not as much as their workload will increase if everyone asks for re-deliveries because they can't bear to go to the Peckham office.

I was at the meeting too, and my recollection is the same as Kiera's.


The union rep gave a very weird speech, and Helen Hayes' eyes and mine met during it, as it was quite clear that he and his members were not in fact generally opposed to the move.


Some individual posties may have been of course, and probably more are opposed now they have realised the reality of the situation, but Royal Mail's consultation would have been with the union, not with individual posties.

sandyman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fed Ex, DHL etc leave parcels with neighbours if

> nobody is in. I don't think Royal Mail does this

> but why not?

>

> I presume they would argue that it might add to

> their posties' workload but not as much as their

> workload will increase if everyone asks for

> re-deliveries because they can't bear to go to the

> Peckham office.



I have had Royal Mail items left with neighbours, and theirs with me, but I have no idea if that is official policy.

I was back there this morning and once again couldn?t park and so ended up in Choumert Road car park again paying for the privilege. I queued for about 20 minutes and was then helped by our former postman who was super helpful, very apologetic about the situation and friendly (his colleagues could learn a lot from him). Phew! Nevertheless the situation prompted me to call Royal Mail and complain about the queues, costs and general inconvenience. I would urge others to do the same...unless we all register our frustration they will not do anything about it.


tel://03457 740 740

I'm on hold with them now. Been waiting since the 18th September for a first class package, another package ordered on 25th still not arrived. Also a magazine subscription which wasn't even posted through the letter box, just flung on to the welcome mat.

The delivery people are well aware of the problems we are facing, and it wouldn't surprise me if, as front-line staff, they are getting the blame for what is clearly poor planning and management (together with unhelpful actions from staff choosing to leave this sinking ship and leading to chronic understaffing - which is hardly the fault of those left). They had hoped for a better work environment (and more money from Inner London Weighting) - instead of which they have increased pressure and work and presumably less job satisfaction.


But the 'service' and I use that word quite wrongly, is an entire fiasco. A 'perishable' item promised for redelivery on Friday has not (yet) appeared - and will have perished when it does. No postal delivery in Underhill yet, who knows if we will have one? I waited till my phone lost battery for the 03456 000 606 re-delivery number to answer - no use (I now know) in using the web site, which just lies.


For the Royal Mail this was not a matter of bad luck (like a flu epidemic cutting back staff) but a self-inflicted wound, and one they were warned about by our representatives. Simple remedy is not enough, Ofcom should also now punish.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We have lots of shoes and need a nice way of organising them! 
    • Invitation to Expectant Parents: Infant Observation Are you due to give birth this September or October? Would you be interested in taking part in an Infant Observation with an NHS honorary psychotherapist?  I am an honorary psychotherapist working with adults in the NHS (Adult Complex Needs, Tavistock Clinic). I need to conduct an Infant Observation as part of my NHS training in psychodynamic psychotherapy. By taking part, you can contribute to mental health services and our understanding of human development from birth. Infant Observation is an established part of psychoanalytic training. It allows for the in-depth study of the early life and development of babies in relation to their caregiver(s) in their home environment. I am looking for expectant parent(s) who would be interested in taking part with their infant from about 6 weeks after birth, ideally beginning Oct/Nov 2025. The observation would take place for one hour each week during term time at the infant's home at the same time each week, to be agreed between myself and the caregiver(s), for the duration of 3 academic terms (roughly 9 months to 1 year). My role would be to non-intrusively observe and reflect on the infant's development and communications. The work is a requirement of my training at the Tavistock and would be supervised by a Tavistock clinician. Parents and caregivers can gain support and insight from taking part at this important and unique time in your baby's development. I work with adults in an Adult Complex Needs unit in the NHS, and at Tavistock Relationships. I have worked in a psychotherapy community for survivors of human rights violations where I helped establish a mother and baby group for refugee and asylum seeking mothers. I have a Phd in Literature & I am a contributor to the London Review of Books. I am working on my first book, a history of childhood. I am coming towards the end of my psychotherapy training having already gained a postgraduate diploma in Psychotherapy from the Tavistock NHS Clinic and University of Essex. If you would be interested in taking part with your infant, please respond to this post. With thanks, Mary Hannity
    • Like most of us, I'm guessing they didn't look into thoroughly
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...