Jump to content

Waitrose or M&S TYPE supermarket - do we want one on LL?


Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Knock down the Iceland? Great idea! Maybe put up a

> 40 story multimillion pound skyscraper in it's

> place with enough room for a Waitrose, mini

> Harrods and a few luxury penthouse apartments,

> maybe even whack a direct tube service to Oxford

> circus (no stops along route). Don't you love

> living in SE22? :-)

>

Come on Louisa - direct route to Knightsbridge please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> M&S and a well linked tube line have done little

> to gentrify Brixton beyond what already Had taken

> place in the preceding 20 odd years.


xxxxxx


Brixton has had an M&S in exactly the same location as it is now since at least the mid-sixties and probably earlier.


And the new "Brixton Village" in the market, I would suggest, has gentrified Brixton out of all recognition over the past year. I was there on Saturday and I was astonished at the changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

adamdb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd really like to see an ASDA or LIDL on

> Lordship Lane. The ones in Peckham are cracking

> and it'd be greater to have better value for money

> on the Lane.


xxxxxx


It's a fairly easy walk from ED down to Asda or Lidl in Peckham, so I can't see why we'd need one in ED as well - but I assume you are just winding people up? :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With sue on this. Blatant wind up. Why would you need two large Asda or Lidl stores with a mile of one another? Not forgetting the other one on Old Kent RD! I think te argument about Waitrose is more the fact that they have no prescence in this part of town,, it's not about value for money or anything else.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I BIG yes to Waitrose. Personally speaking, while the staff at the Co-op are great their grub is poor. I've lost count of the amount of fruit and veg I've got from there that has gone rotten within a few days. It's just not on. That said, the bonus has been that it's made me get my fruit and veg now from the North Cross Road store (what's it called?), which is itself is brilliant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shop full of?


Little plastic boxes with small amounts over processed over priced ?Food?


A British take on some Japanese shops only in Japan it tastes great and is priced (in local terms) reasonably.


You know it?s wrong when the packaging costs more than the product.



http://www.designer-daily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/waitrose.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on, stop being so silly. What on earth is wrong with spending ?2 on a pot of soup?


Even if you think it tastes bad (I would disagree), if the alternative is to spend an hour of my time making a soup from scratch, give me the Waitrose verion any day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
    • More than the 2 contestants, the format and production was the main fault last night - allowing 45 seconds for an answer will get you those responses from any 2 candidates Awful show
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...