Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No I would show them a different way ,of how they could be better than Vicky Pollard type girls,and rise to

a more intellectual level.

The programme is a good measure for young girls, who with a bit of nous would think,Good God I.d hate to be like them.

Maybe if you had gone to a Appleby fair,you would be enlightened.

@Tarot, whilst I totally recognise why you suggest other options, this whole work will set you free is not always for everyone. I have this graeco Roman perception about the ephimeral innocence of youth and the possibilities that this time present. There's a reason why advertising and the media in general seem to be youth obsessed. I guess I'm slightly hesitant because of your eagerness to find nothing valuable in something that they find valuable. Young and old people make mistakes, some of these girls may end up in unsatisfactory relationships and just maybe some of them will feel like they are living fulfilled and meaningful lives.

Was your early reading Mills and Boon.you have a very romantic view about young people,its not the real world though is it.

When those gypsy girls get married, they will probably be threatened not to flaunt themselves in front of men and never

dress that way again.

The end of the fairytale for them.

Your view of this little shangrila impedes progress.

Your idea is they are happy with their lot and no one should interfere.

Sounds like pond life and you are the sympathetic superior.

They allowed cameras to film them, therfore putting their lifes up for comparisans.

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No I would show them a different way ,of how they

> could be better than Vicky Pollard type girls,and

> rise to

> a more intellectual level.

> The programme is a good measure for young girls,

> who with a bit of nous would think,Good God I.d

> hate to be like them.

> Maybe if you had gone to a Appleby fair,you would

> be enlightened.


Yer, you still watched it though, yeah?


2/10 this time I'm afraid. See me after class. Etc.

I'm no expert but I believe the term gypsy refers to a distinct racial group found throughout Europe who have their roots in India but travelled to Europe many centuries ago. Traveller refers to any group of any racial origin with no fixed abode who travel around the country - e.g. scots and irish tinkers and laterly the so called "new age travellers" (where have they gone??)
Actualy it was not only at weddings that the young girls wore such skimpy clothing ( 4 yrs upwords ) the teenage girls wore shorts and bra tops whilst parading around the streets. Call me old fashioned, but it does not make sense and its rather a large controdiction from implemanting strict rules to the girls but then allowing them to exibit the half naked bodies.

The Romanies I have met while painting at a fairground on a carousel often talked to me about"their roots" they

were told by word of mouth by their families, that they had been here from before the middle ages.

There roots were Rome,having gone their as early Christians as slaves.

They managed to escape to Europe,And coloured their skins with wild berries to disquise themselves as a nomadic tribe,

they called themselves Gypsies,and reaching Britain they travelled with the actors and fairs and sold things and

told fortunes.

I found this very informative for my studies.

The young boy in BGW knew who he was, a traveller. They used to be called Pikeies, before P.C.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

I read his thread with interest and so felt I should add my comment / observation. I actually live opppostie a gypsy site (they prefer to be called gypsies rather than travellers) and quite recently there was a 'big fat gypsy' wedding which went on for 2 and a half days. The dresses were pretty much as they are in the documentary and the bride is 16 yrs old.


so far that much of the documentary seems to be true however, having lived oppostie the site for many years, i don't think the women are disrespected by the men, as portrayed in the prog. form where I sit, and i think i have a pretty good view point, from my living room window, it seems to be a matriarchal culture. The women seem to give as good as they get.


As a documentary maker, I know that showing them as people who just happen to live in caravans is pretty dull, it just wouldn't make a programme. I do however think there is a socio-anthropological prog there to be made.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...