Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Concern mounts over Dianne Abbot's health as she falls seriously ill yet again - just prior to one-on-one interview live on Woman's hour today.


Coming so soon after she was sadly afflicted with migraine which prevented her from voting on Article 50, genuine conern mounts over such a key shadow cabinet member.


Show her your support by voting for her on 8th as none of us want to miss out on her contributions in the future.

Dianne's trouble is she's had it too good for too long, with a nice comfy seat. And who wouldn't enjoy that, along with sending her boy to private shool.


Only now she gets a shot at the bigger stage, and she's unfit for the gig at hand. All the years of defending 'the party' and saying 'MANDATE' as many times as a human being can, have left her thin on policy matters, and here right now is when policy matters matter.


She might have been able to guff her way through meetings with her own party, constituency, on a TV debate. But the nitty gritty is beyond her and she's been found out.


Plus she's developed that slow-slow style of answer, which under pressure just comes across as time wasting.


Lastly, she's irritating beyond measure, she knows it, and plays on it.

Windrush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Concern mounts over Dianne Abbot's health as she

> falls seriously ill yet again - just prior to

> one-on-one interview live on Woman's hour today.

>

> Coming so soon after she was sadly afflicted with

> migraine which prevented her from voting on

> Article 50, genuine conern mounts over such a key

> shadow cabinet member.

>

> Show her your support by voting for her on 8th as

> none of us want to miss out on her contributions

> in the future.


*chuckles to self

hardly a reason to vote fore someone... coz they're "ill"

*continues chuckling

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dianne's trouble is she's had it too good for too

> long, with a nice comfy seat. And who wouldn't

> enjoy that, along with sending her boy to private

> shool.

>

> Only now she gets a shot at the bigger stage, and

> she's unfit for the gig at hand. All the years of

> defending 'the party' and saying 'MANDATE' as many

> times as a human being can, have left her thin on

> policy matters, and here right now is when policy

> matters matter.

>

> She might have been able to guff her way through

> meetings with her own party, constituency, on a TV

> debate. But the nitty gritty is beyond her and

> she's been found out.

>

> Plus she's developed that slow-slow style of

> answer, which under pressure just comes across as

> time wasting.

>

> Lastly, she's irritating beyond measure, she knows

> it, and plays on it.



I'm not qualified to know what's culture and what's just her - Lots of Jamaicans I speak to speak to speak very slowly and I have read that she works very hard and well between giving bad interviews


It did feel a little racist this morning when two posh white people (Keir Starmer being interviewed by Sarah Jane Mee) were talking about her with her having no ability to respond.

There wasn't really any pressure on her on the Brillo show though. It was generally a relaxed environment where opposing views weren't seriously challenged, and consensus was seen as a good thing


Now that she's having to be more partisan and is being challenged in detail, she's been found out.

Maybe - she shouldn't get drawn into the detail then - There's something uncomfortable in my view about the way she's being demonised (Sky just did it again - "someone like Diane Abbott") - but she'll recover :)


I'm not usually that PC either - if someone says check your privilege - I normally say - yeah, I've got it :)

Last night's Evening Standard went so far but today's Times provide's puts more flesh on yesterdays health bulletin.

QUOTE...


Diane Abbott appeared to have been spotted at a London tube station chatting on her phone yesterday after pulling out of a debate on Radio 4?s Woman?s Hour because of illness.


A Twitter user named Nick Astaire posted a photograph yesterday morning with the caption ?@BBCWomansHour this is a picture of Dianne Abbot in Oxford Circus tube station at 8.40am this morning ? not seeming very unwell #whdebate.?


Ms Abbott then appeared to be caught out by an email prankster who sent her a message purporting to be from Seumas Milne, Mr Corbyn?s director of communications. She apparently said in a response: ?Do you still want to add colour to the illness story? If so maybe we should speak.? In reply to a second email from ?@Sinon_Reborn?, she said: ?I am not sure what colour I can add . . . I am worried about telling untruths about my health which are easily disproved?.


http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t643/savedelhi/Public%20Album/Abbot_zpssygh7raz.jpg

UNQUOTE

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Everyone thinks she's pretending to be ill - but I

> see signs of stress and distress and I'm beginning

> to hate the term "car crash interview".

>

> It can't be nice when you're portrayed as a

> national joke.


It didn't start here.


Andrew Neil used to constantly seek to embarrass her on This Week. And easily succeeded but I used to feel for her.


So even for a long time pre election, she showed she wasn't up to the required level, that's needed to cope with the political sparring that you can expect at the top in politics. Especially when the heat is on.

JohnL


I see that you already mentioned This Week - I however had a very different take on it.


I think Portillo was supportive and kind, so their interaction may have been as you said - but her interactions with Andrew Neil were embarrassing towards the end. Almost like he was trying to "embarrass" her out of the programme.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A bit late in the game for a substitute, had to be

> done though.

>

> Is there enough time to reassure the voting masses

> that Lyn Brown is up to it?


Tories on my Twitter timeline have accused her of kicking a blind mans dog :(


Hope it's a load of rubbish

Why does it matter whether Brown is up to it (if you mean the HS job)? - Diane's only tactically 'out' until she's 'better'.


She has not resigned or been replaced in the usual sense. She's just been side-lined (to try to save votes) in a way that doesn't look so embarrassing and obvious as it did yesterday.


Her email in response to the fake one speaks volumes! Anyone who is not being intellectually dishonest can see that!!


Cynics might say that sleeping with Jezza, back in the day, means she can't be booted out for long.

It's easy gone cynical and I'm suspicious myself I must admit (it looks like she's been sidelined following some poor performances). But it is also possible that she is actually unwell. It might even explain why she's been so far off her game of late.
Maybe she really is ill? Not all health problems are as easy to spot as a broken leg. Given the timing it's natural that Labour's head of comms would be under pressure to package it into a neat statement that can be made to fit in with the bigger story. Cockup rather than conspiracy, perhaps. Also natural for other parties and the media to jump all over it, if distasteful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. My own view is that the BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie even now. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this a story, more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty time, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to "...fight. We fight like Hell and if you don't fight like Hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. Both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet is ridiculous'. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him where to go, does show a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...