Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That old chestnut.


The fact ?I say? there isn?t one good restaurant in the village obviously points me being a duck? That V Funny!


Rather than a very disappointed consumer who?s had to suffer dreadful food at every turn in the Village.


Now I?m expecting another bunch of imbeciles who haven?t been to CRocca ?S4!T? to start going on about how bad I am. When it?s CRocca Poo that?s bad.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------

> It's also worth pointing out that protesting your

> innocence doesn't make any difference - that's

> what serial killers and their mums do. If you want

> people to perceive you as a generally honest and

> positive contributor, then start being positive

> and start contributing somethin of value instead

> of smearing restaurants.


As close to a Godwin as you can get without getting your credibility burnt

Witch hunt?. ?


Back on subject?.


Anyone got a good restaurant they can recommend for Lunch in and around East Dulwich or the Village maybe one I havn?t noticed?


I quite like the palmerston ?expensive? and thai corner caf? ?when open? and ganapati ?quality?.


Or if I?m on for a Caf? I quite like the one next to property inn and the shoe shop on L Lane.


Anyone ?

Poor Fazer, in amongst the shower of bullets there are some nuggets of good advice there, the main one being you have made and defended your point repeatedly, time to move on. Pkease feel free to comment on any of my million threads,I welcome a fiery spirit.


It's all a learning curve, those long-timers tend to be harsh on us newbies, it's all part of the etiquette training..

But a good start at recovery.


I doubt there's much around here that's not known about, though Le Moulin seems to have an SEP field around it.

It has its yeasayers around here (most notably the legendary Louisa) but I haven't been. If I get an urge for angel delight and prawn cocktail* I'll be willing to give it a go.


I second Ganapati, the closest thing we have to a hidden gem in the area.


* in all fairness I may be doing the place a disservice, especially never having been.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So I saw. If we all liked the same things it'd be

> a dull world.



true, true... you hated ganapati Frank but loved two sisters tandoori which i found very disappointing - takes all sorts.

Maxxi, I think that's a misreading of Godwins Law, which involves the concept of Reductio Ad Absurdum


I wasn't trying to compare fazer71 to a serial killer, nor trying to use hyperbole to win a specious argument - I was merely trying to point out that protesting one's innocence was a waste of breath: it's the evidence that counts.


I was also joking, which is notoriously absent from Godwin's interpretation.

Snorky's law

From Edipedia, the free and nonsense local encyclopaedia


:X - Mr Snorky, formulator of the "law"


Snorky's law (also known as The Recursive Godwin Rule, The Rule of Nazi Analogy Analogies or Snorky's Law of Tiresome Bollox)[1][2] is a humorous observation made by Mr Snorky in 2011[2] which has become an Internet adage. It states: "anyone who uses/ quotes or references Godwins[sic] law at any point, even if it is tongue in cheek and Ironic.[sic] is quite frankly,[sic] a tiresome and unoriginal drone"

One of the other less well known laws of Huncamunca regards the tiresome use of Grammatical and punctuatation pendantry that serves as a response or counterpoint to a preceding post , usually as a means to humilate or show a lack of intelligence in the OP and/or a demonstation of educational achievement,invariably places responder further into tiresome drone category.

I would never dream of suggesting a lack of intelligence as you clearly are as sharp as they come. A little misguided maybe, but that's another story ;-P

So safe to assume I was going for some common or garden humiliation, whilst simultaneously showing my appreciation for your caustic wit in a demonstration of my ambivalence; my post was after all an homage, not an attack.

Very interesting...


But fazer71 has got a point I thought rocca was really awful.


So still not suggestions of anywhere to get a decent lunch around dulwich "east and village or near?"


Maybe it's a hopeless request or maybe average to poor quality is what is accepted by locals?

I notice that you edited your post to include your blight against Rocca, are you in cahoots with Fazer71? Hehe


Why don't you try the Rye pub on Peckham Rye - they are having a food festival this weekend. I've tried the vietnamese offering at Broadway Market - that was 'yummy'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
    • Looks great! but could it be possible to pinch the frames a bit tighter with some long nose pliers and add more struts to stop the tree rats getting inside? Also, the only issue with a mesh base is that it could attract rats towards your property.
    • I struggled with the parakeets literally decimating the bird feeders within an hour.  I tried squirrel proof ones to see if they helped, but they jammed their claws in the mechanism to stop it closing.  Then the pigeons managed to do the same.  I spent a long time researching the best ideas and came across something on Pinterest.  Someone had used a metal dog cage and attached it to a wooden platform.  So that's what I did!  Once set up, you just hang the feeders inside.  Large birds like pigeons and parakeets cannot get inside.  I get all the small birds, plus starlings.  Not many thrushes or blackbirds around, so have no idea if they could get in.  The squirrels do!  It's amazing watching them slide through narrow gaps.  I also covered the roof of the cage with a piece of plastic to keep the rain off, plus I am just about to replace the cage plastic base with something more mesh like.  It can get a bit gooey after a while, so with mesh, all the dropped seed from the messy goldfinches, will go on to the ground where the pigeons can clear up.  I even added a birdcam.  
    • Yep, of course I do - did you not read the bit from the survey about the noise having a negative impact on foraging bats? And like @Angelina I'm aware it affects other people, and if no one complains then it gives them an argument that's it's all ok.  The tree in question was a cherry that everyone loves, didn't need to be touched, and the council admitted was a mistake and shouldn't have happened.  The council and Gala use the 'local' narrative as a benefit, without any figures to back it up. It is used as an argument for the event to go ahead, when there's no basis of fact. The attendees are clearly not local as they've proved they don't give a **** about the area. The council do tell us where the money is spent - 100% on running the Events dept, and a myriad of unlisted free events. They just don't tell us how much, so that we can make an informed decision on whether the gain is with the pain.  Sorry, what was your point again?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...