Jump to content

Charlie Sheen


aspidistra

Recommended Posts

Yeah MP, I too would enjoy his refusal to be a role model, and if he really made those comments above then he's a drug addled genius.


But the wife-beating thing is what makes him a cunt in my book. A lesser son of greater sires.


His dad's awesome, and was just about the hottest thing I've ever seen in Badlands. I'm cheering for the clean-living (well, relatively I guess) brother and father Estevez combo in whatever their film's called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think MP too old for the wild man of Hollywood

> Act


But you're only as old as the woman you feel. I don't subscribe to the notion that you should stop being "wild" (read "a twat on drugs") just because you reach a certain age. Plenty of us are twats at times without the drugs and more power to our arthritic elbows, and more power to theirs.


And frankly, without the twats, just think of all the Closer / Heat / Grazia / OK Hot Stars / When Bad Things Happen to Famous People journalists that would be looking for a job. We just can't afford to have that many more people on JSA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of the boring predictability of being a total fricking rock star from Mars I chose to follow my heart and pursue an uncompromising life of office based mediocrity.


Of course the world I have chosen to inhabit does not contain as many groupies and involve as much liberal drug use as a reasonable man would reasonably expect but there is cake. A lot can be said for having a satisfactory amount of cake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But the wife-beating thing is what makes him a @#$%& in my book.


Quite. I don't understand why everyone is choosing to ignore this, painting him as some sort of loveable rogue, or harmless hedonist. He's not. He's a fucking prick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are much worse things than drug addled

> megalomania. Like piles and cabbage.


Cabbage sadly does not receive the reverence it so rightly deserves. There ought to be an appreciation society. Or at least a thread dedicated to the damn stuff. Or something.


Back on topic, Charlie Sheen once starred in a film (yes, film. NOT movie) about cabbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd go ever further than that, and say he is a

> @#$%& @#$%&.



Well obviously.


I just can?t bring myself to give a shit about these sort of people enough to actually have opinions about them. Actors, pop singers etc. they?re just dancing monkeys really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosie I don?t agree with you, I think at some point in life you have to grow up not saying you have to wear pipe and sleepers and cardigans because you are a certain age but yes you do have to grow up this guy has children what example is he setting that is ok to hit women get rat arse and be very abusive.


Further more we all see what happens to stars like Charlie Sheen loss of respectability and creditability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ridgley - hitting women has nothing whatsoever to do with being grown up or otherwise. Don't conflate the arguments.


Everyone's entitled to be Peter Pan should they so choose. Everyone is not entitled to cause harm to another person, in whatever form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya Charlie was born to this megastar dad and followed in of his megastar dad (not hard to do) into acting init. But had his dad been a pit man would lil' ole' charlie been able to afford the easy escapist philadering route of drugs...........


The guy is LAZY LAZY LAZY and like all lazy people will take the easiest route out (just that his attracts media headlines by association and oh he doesn't have to steal to support it).


Don't even get me started on women beating..................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
    • Hello again, Rubie, my cat, is still missing. He has been gone since 18th April.  Rubie is black and white, with black ears, a splendid white moustache, white front paws, and mostly white back legs.  Please check your sheds etc as he may be trapped, he’s a curious little thing.  I would really appreciate any help and suggestions. Thank you.
    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...