Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The whole agenda is getting crazier and crazier. They are going to put in double (yes double) yellow lines at the Village end of Calton Avenue for instance. This is despite there being several small traders, including a book shop, that will be particularly adversely affected especially at the weekends. It seems that all the 'traffic control' methods and controlled parking the council employ simply speed up the cars. Look at East Dulwich Grove, it's like a racetrack at times. The traffic in Lordship Lane is generally much slower mainly because of the excellent crossings between Whately Road and Goose Green. If the council really wanted to slow down traffic they need to put more pedestrian crossings in and more roundabouts. Not more yellow lines. What on earth is their agenda??
They have more or less said the agenda is to drastically reduce car ownership and thereby cars on the roads. They want us all to cycle and walk. They are clearly prepared to pursue that agenda ruthlessly. It seems local reps, even outside Swark Labour, also support this agenda. Fanaticism trumps pragmatism.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Us singletons don't really care about noise too

> > much - except the revving motorbikes - stop

> that

> > :)

>

> Speak for yourself!!!


With my area the argument is the flats were built after the clubs etc. so we knew when we purchased there will be noise - there's a huge new lot about to be sold opposite me too so I'd expect arguments over the next 6 months.


I know for a fact some people complain.

Sally Eva Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're sure it wasn't just pushing up the cost of

> the journey?

>

> The charge is raised for the morning peak I think.

> Is there an increase for length of journey and

> time it takes?


The prices were normal until around 0830 when I needed the cab. I could see the GPS screen which was giving him directions to take those roads. He also was directed along back streets in Tulse Hill, Streatham and Balham to get me to the tube station on Balham High Road. Fare was I think ?16 for what should have been a ?10 fare which had taken 25 mins from the Melford Road end of Lordship Lane.


A second journey using Uber to West Norwood sensibly used Dulwich Common and Thurlow Park Road, only diverting to avoid the Tulse Hill junction.

Monkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The day I feel I can trust Southern again, I might

> just stop paying ?125 a month in parking charges

> in Brixton and driving through Dulwich to get

> there.


You could cycle to Brixton in 10-15 minutes and save the parking charges.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They have more or less said the agenda is to

> drastically reduce car ownership and thereby cars

> on the roads. They want us all to cycle and walk.

> They are clearly prepared to pursue that agenda

> ruthlessly. It seems local reps, even outside

> Swark Labour, also support this agenda. Fanaticism

> trumps pragmatism.


Good. London is literally choking to death on vehicle fumes, the vast majority of which are generated by unnecessary journeys (65% of car journeys in London are under than three miles, and 33% less than a mile and a half). Health and clean air trump the "right" to drive a motor vehicle. Allowing 10,000 premature deaths a year from pollution, two thousand a year killed or seriously injured in accidents (and 28,000 more less seriously injured) and countless children growing up with reduced lung function for life and chronic respiratory diseases is not pragmatism, it's insanity.

Rendel,


Clearly, cycling walking and relyng on public transport works for you. Jolly good for you. Not everyone is so fortunate or has only regular daily work journeys of between one and a half and three miles. Equally, for a fair few, there will be a need to ferry tools and equipment to and from jobs- more than will fit into a couple of panniers or a rucksack. There are myriad reasons why your chosen forms of travel will not work for everyone. Add to that the parlous state of local rail services and these measures to force through change at top speed look almost bonkers.

I think that First Mate and Rendel both have valid points.

The best anyone can do is honestly take a look at their habits and needs and wants, and see whether a realistic and reasonable alternative to motor transport can be found, even for a small proportion of those needs/wants/habits. Eg. if you hate being on a crowded bus, walk - even if it is just for the length of a few stops.

Ultimately it boils down to individuals, so it starts with you, not the person you are arguing with on the EDF.

Nigello,


I do agree and I actually walk a lot and sometimes cycle too, but currently would find it near impossible to work without a car. My beef is not with the issues driving change but the manner in which change is being forced through at top speed by various impositions. Single factor issues With simplistic solutions are politically attractive and appeal to the idealist in all of us but I think current efforts to clear streets of traffic before we've even properly addressed and fixed a train service, may create more problems than it solves.

Agreed: if we wait for the powers that be to change things, we'll be waiting a long time, hence my belief that only individuals working alongside each other can change traffic levels. Sometimes you have to drive or be driven but not always. Changing habits and thoughts about what is one's "right" can have an immediate and positive effect: i.e. just walk to the Picture House tonight instead of driving the 1.5 miles.
I agree with both of you Nigello and FM - I do recognise that there are people who need to use the car sometimes, including me, I wouldn't fancy cycling to Croydon with the ma-in-law's weekly shop! It's the continuous use of cars for the school run by people who could walk if they got up twenty minutes earlier, for shopping in a supermarket fifteen minutes' walk away etc that gets to me. I just think that, as Nigello sensibly suggests, people need to look at their usage and see where it can be trimmed - for example, a mate of mine, a builder/decorator, was driving everywhere as he had too much kit for anything else. His missus suggested he ask his clients if he could lock his tools up somewhere on site - cupboard under the stairs, garden shed, garage, whatever - and they've always been amenable, now from driving every day he drives twice to each job, once at the start and once at the end, and cycles the rest of the time.
  • 5 months later...

Southwark is consulting until 24 January on the Dulwich Traffic Study. Background info here:

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-and-building-control/planning-policy-and-transport-policy/consultation-and-updates/transport-policy


And an interactive map where you can support/oppose measures (rather than propose anything new) is here: https://dulwich-study.co.uk/


Generally appears to be an exercise showing something is being done. The study has come up with ideas as simple as: improve wayfinding signage, add cycle parking, new Controlled Parking Zone, monitor traffic etc. E.g. for Lordship Lane the main recommendation is to consider renewing the pavement.


Wouldn't it have been more productive to consult on objectives then trying to work out backwards how to achieve those that were supported. Top-of-the-head examples could be: create safe routes for every school, reduce bus delays by 10%, reduce private motor traffic in the area by 10% by 2025.


Southwark has real problems with air quality, congestion and child obesity: population growth is likely to increase these pressures. So this study should have come up with a wide range of ideas from simple to radical, short to long-term, to help encourage thinking outside the box. There are some great initiatives elsewhere in London and beyond - that could have provided inspiration. Feels like Southwark is increasingly falling behind other London boroughs when it comes to healthy streets.

Unfortunately, whilst the Council rubber stamps the conversion of average sized family homes into 2 or 3 flats and every bit of spare ground is allowed to sprout a block of flats then of course the amount of traffic will increase- population increase = vehicle increase....simples...but then...
Okay, so how many (fit/ healthy) parents on this forum would commit to never using their car for school drop offs and pick ups, or for shopping/ entertainment? That includes cold, dark rainy mornings when using a car is so tempting?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Returning to the original question, I had my jabs at Tessa Jowell yesterday. I was early and I was  seen on time, and it was a lovely pharmacist who did them, but the admin beforehand (not by her) was a bit iffy. I was given forms to fill in but not told what to do with them afterwards, so I  presumed I had to take them into the consulting room, as the rest was supposed to be filled in by a clinician, but no! After some time had elapsed and I had found a seat (there was no information on where to sit either, so people were sitting in two separate areas, neither of which had many seats) my name was called and  the forms were taken behind the counter. Be aware if you don't have an appointment - even in the relatively short time I was there, three people turned up without appointments having been sent there by a GP (I presume) or having  previously been  asked by the pharmacy to come  back at a different time, and they were all sent away again because the pharmacy didn't have enough flu vaccine until the following day. I have no idea if this was due to a misunderstanding on the people's side, their GP's or the pharmacy's, but none of them were very happy, and one lady said she "couldn't keep coming back" 😭  At least one of them didn't seem to understand what he was being told, possibly due to a language issue. I felt quite sorry for the pharmacist, who was giving jabs all day on top of her usual workload but still managing to stay cheerful! Though she wasn't the one dealing with the unhappy people! I have a sore arm from the Covid jab (I chose to have the jabs in different arms), but no other ill effects so far, touch wood. 
    • Line speed and the strength of your Wi-Fi signal are two separate things.  The first is determined by the type of connection (fibre/copper etc) to the outside world and the second is the connection between the device (printer/TV/laptop/tablet etc) and the router. If you are connecting a device to the router using cables (as Alec1 is) then this is will give the best possible connection but isn't practical for many without a degree of upheaval and even then not all devices (tablets for example) will allow a wired connection. So you relying on the quality of the Wi-Fi signal from the router to the device and this will depend on the quality of the router, the type of Wi-Fi connection (the frequency), line of sight etc - many different things.  This is why some people opt for a "mesh" type setup which is supposed to give a solid quality of Wi-Fi signal around the house with little or no blackspots.  It's expensive though and still requires the devices that send and receive the signal (like the plug-ins you have) to be wired to the router.
    • We have had a few cat flaps over the years but none have been electronic. They just have a small clip that you turn to lock or open.  Some come with a magnet and a matching magnet that the cat wears on its collar  This prevents other cats entering.  I've not used these as I don't like the idea of a cat wearing a collar. Cats do like to be out at night and you need to encourage yours to return after a late evening sortie. Calling,rustling treat wrappers worked for ours but he seems to have now got into the habit of coming back about 9pm. without this.        
    • Having had several cats over the past 40 years - mainly rescue, we have a tried and tested routine, Initially confined to one room with litter tray/food/water - we take it in turns to stay for a few minutes several times a day so they become familiar with our scent. They are gradually introduced to the rest of the house. We have a wire cat basket and we place cat in basket and take them outside, over a few days we place basket in different areas of the garden - grass area/gravel area, patio area etc - different flowers/plants. Some of the more nervous cats we walk around the garden on a lead. They get use to the scent of the garden. We have a cat flap in the back door so they have full access - If we need to keep cat in - just block off the cat flap so they cannot escape! We are now down to one elderly cat - who during the summer just laid on the garden chairs and came in for food, but as weather getting colder prefers to sit on a worktop in the kitchen looking out into the garden. So we are back to the cat litter as she is reluctant to go out in the rain/cold.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...