Jump to content

Recommended Posts

These filmings are good news.


Southwark Council gets revenue from issuing a permit to the filming company for using the public domain for commercial purposes.


HMRC gets a tax payment from the resident after the tax return showing the fee from the filming company is submitted.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And you'll spend ?10k restoring your property

> after a film crew's been through it. Make sure you

> get a lot of insurance before you let them in.


Its the Location Manager who ensures there's no damage and their insurance should cover it (as per the agreement you sign) but of course, accidents happen. It must be very rare for a property needing 10k of repairs. Have you some experience of extensive damage from a location shoot?

It's the production company's responsibility to make good any damage caused by filming. This can often be very expensive but nothing to do with your own insurance.


worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And you'll spend ?10k restoring your property

> after a film crew's been through it. Make sure you

> get a lot of insurance before you let them in.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the production company's responsibility to

> make good any damage caused by filming. This can

> often be very expensive but nothing to do with

> your own insurance.


Is it prudent for the "host" to take out temporary additional public liability insurance as this commercial activity is unlikely to be covered by the "host's" regular insurance and as protection if a claim arises and the production company's insurance is defective?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
    • Was the driver still with it when the police arrived?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...