Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I will not be filling out my census form this

> time... which is illegal. I can only hope that

> millions of other will not want to give their data

> to a US arms company, and will object to the ?150

> million contract being given to them, when public

> sector jobs are being lost!

>

>

> I'm not signing mine and here's why.Please sign

> the petition



Can I point you in this direction kind sir?

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?27,635771,636325#msg-636325

Got mine ages ago, did it online (had no trouble ianr) but was a bit bemused because the census is supposed to be for a particular (much later) day, but it took all the details OK including who was staying at my house that day!


I'm very cynical about the census, I've worked on it twice as an enumerator, the first time was OK, but the last time there were so many cock-ups I just can't believe the results can be accurate.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Got mine ages ago, did it online (had no trouble

> ianr) but was a bit bemused because the census is

> supposed to be for a particular (much later) day,

> but it took all the details OK including who was

> staying at my house that day!

>


Its all supposed to be for the 27th, none of it should be relevant to the day you filled it in??


Shouldn't it?

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Its all supposed to be for the 27th, none of it

> should be relevant to the day you filled it in??

>

> Shouldn't it?


xxxxxxx


Exactly. So why don't they block the online site from taking details till 27th? It's just a joke.

Sue, I think on 27 March you're going to have to recreate the exact circumstances as at the time you submitted the form. The alternatives – prison, a local collapse of space-time, decreased funding for the ED Home for Wayward Hamsters, whatever – don't really bear thinking about.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You might change your plans regarding people

> staying at your house on that night, however,

> which is one of the questions :)


As Harold Wilson almost said, a week is a long time in domestic inter-personal relations. B)

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I think on 27 March you're going to have to

> recreate the exact circumstances as at the time

> you submitted the form. The alternatives –

> prison, a local collapse of space-time, decreased

> funding for the ED Home for Wayward Hamsters,

> whatever – don't really bear thinking about.


xxxxxxxxx


:)) :)-D


Bit of a joke though, isn't it, what's the point in having a census supposedly taken on a certain day and then clearly opening the door to all sorts of inaccuracies.

Having heard the man in charge of organising the Indian census I must say I like their approach. There is an island off the mainland where the natives are less than friendly. In fact it's been made a no-fly zone due to the spear throwing the planes started. Come census time the officials approach the island but not too closely. They throw from their boat into the sea coconuts and others items of interest to the locals.


Once the tide brings the items in, the natives come out of hiding to collect everything. When this happens the officials are ready with their camera's and click away. This is how the islands inhabitants are counted. Great. Not sure how they decide what religion they are though.

I would have thought they could do better in helping folk avoid that error.


I'm also suspecting that a moderate percentage of people will include as visitors those who've been staying overnight 26-27th, rather than on the Sunday night 27-28th. The only explicit confirmation I found on the website is in the glossary, which I only discovered indirectly: "Census night is the night of Sunday 27 March going into the morning of Monday 28 March."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of Smoke Control law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all per se, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...