Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy, actually, I don't care about housing benefit - but the logic of the argument struck me. If its a question of paying for people to live somewhere they can't afford, you'd have to target anyone who claimed HB by definition. Squatters may not pay economic rent, but then neither do those who claim HB and receive relief on council tax - which is apparently what people object to because where is the contribution?

Wow - what a varied community of onlookers we have responding on here! Some friendly - Some bordering on fascist! Well I urge all the unfriendly to go to anger management classes asap! Perhaps the contribution I could best make to this area would be to invite all the angry east dulwich empty property owners, and the renters who pay off their landlord home-owner mortgages for their 20th house,over to my new SQUAT for a big old rave up with some MDMA and dogs - I'll get my dealer to source you all! Perhaps that will satisfy the stereotype. LOL


I've received an enormous amount of private messages whereby friendly people have sent me local empty properties and I've been checking them out all day. Some even have TO RENT signs outside. Well a THANK YOU to all you. God Bless the soles of your shoes! Hopefully its not the old bill trying to bust my ass!

Maybe this thread should be renamed THE LIST OF EMPTY PROPERTIES IN THE DULWICH AREA...?

Just write down the addresses here for the whole community to see it but please make sure the building is not occupied by an old granny or grandma or ANYONE! I've got family in the area myself! Afraid I won't be in this evening and tonight/or for a while unless I can pick up someones wi-fi from my new location because I'll be doing you know what!

Squatting was certainly common in London in the 70s, at least in part because inner london gentrification hadn't got going and so there were lots of empty, run down houses that it was not economical to let. There wasn't much opposition because nobody cared much about absentee landlords who had let the properties decay.


It's a bit different now - if you go looking for a place with a 'To Let' sign and then find an open window (yeah, right) and move in as a squatter, you're just a thief in all but name.

Best of luck Lady Jane, but if you're going to squat in a residential home, i'd get your skates on. Not long now until this will be criminalised.


As an aside, it's interesting to see the signs that are put up by squatters referring to Section 6 Criminal Law Act 1977 and warning not to use violence to enter premises are completely meaningless in most cases where squatters move into someone's residential home. Nothing stopping residential occupier from breaking into their own home.


Useful guidance here: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/1868817.pdf


Best make sure you pick a place where the owners are unlikely to force entry themselves...

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/house-and-home/property/squatters-rights--and-wrongs-2144131.html


This makes for an interesting read, for both sides of the debate... I personally disagree with squatting in this day and age where living costs are so expensive. Don't see why you should have the choice of opting out of paying via living in someone elses, albeit empty, house who IS paying for it. But hey, thats just my POV.

LadyJane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've received an enormous amount of private

> messages whereby friendly people have sent me

> local empty properties and I've been checking them

> out all day. Some even have TO RENT signs outside.

> Well a THANK YOU to all you. God Bless the soles

> of your shoes! Hopefully its not the old bill

> trying to bust my ass!


Oh Lordy.. you've overcooked it. Is this your first time?

pinkhalf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Appropo this thread, it turns out I need a new

> home for my several dogs on a string (mange,

> benefit claimants, never worked and carry

> immigrant fleas) - can anyone help me break into a

> small, overpriced workers cottage with designer

> furniture in East Dulwich and alienate all my

> neighbours? Please?


There is a very unpleasant racist anti immigrant tone here.

Great work LadyJane.

You probably haven't found a property as a result of this thread but it is one of the most entertaining threads for months.


Have you now moved into the derelict house on ED Grove? Someone is definitely squatting there now. Maybe too late if you aren't.


As a matter of interest, stories abound of squatters who end up doing up the place they are squatting in and the owners being very pleased with the results when the squatters actually move out. Is this ever true or just urban myths?

LadyJane you should try Clapham and Brixton, where many occupants of short life co op properties have been re housed and their co ops dissolved by Lambeth Council. Unfortunately Lambeth doesn't appear to be doing anything with the properties that they have emptied, so they're there empty, we know not for how long, but some have been unoccupied for over a year now. They're all in reasonable condition as the co ops were in occupancy for 30years, they have the basics, water, electric, gas, but are in danger of falling in to disrepair fast if left empty, so of you go!

This thread has given me a good laugh, well done LadyJane to making people sit up and take note.

I can see many spluttering and choking into their lattes.

BTW I think the concrete house has been reclaimed, I'm sure it was featured on a programme this morning as being brought up to scratch after 14 years.

nunheadbelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread has given me a good laugh, well done

> LadyJane to making people sit up and take note.

> I can see many spluttering and choking into their

> lattes.

> BTW I think the concrete house has been reclaimed,

> I'm sure it was featured on a programme this

> morning as being brought up to scratch after 14

> years.


AT LEAST 21 YEARS THAT I KNOW OF.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...