Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy, actually, I don't care about housing benefit - but the logic of the argument struck me. If its a question of paying for people to live somewhere they can't afford, you'd have to target anyone who claimed HB by definition. Squatters may not pay economic rent, but then neither do those who claim HB and receive relief on council tax - which is apparently what people object to because where is the contribution?

Wow - what a varied community of onlookers we have responding on here! Some friendly - Some bordering on fascist! Well I urge all the unfriendly to go to anger management classes asap! Perhaps the contribution I could best make to this area would be to invite all the angry east dulwich empty property owners, and the renters who pay off their landlord home-owner mortgages for their 20th house,over to my new SQUAT for a big old rave up with some MDMA and dogs - I'll get my dealer to source you all! Perhaps that will satisfy the stereotype. LOL


I've received an enormous amount of private messages whereby friendly people have sent me local empty properties and I've been checking them out all day. Some even have TO RENT signs outside. Well a THANK YOU to all you. God Bless the soles of your shoes! Hopefully its not the old bill trying to bust my ass!

Maybe this thread should be renamed THE LIST OF EMPTY PROPERTIES IN THE DULWICH AREA...?

Just write down the addresses here for the whole community to see it but please make sure the building is not occupied by an old granny or grandma or ANYONE! I've got family in the area myself! Afraid I won't be in this evening and tonight/or for a while unless I can pick up someones wi-fi from my new location because I'll be doing you know what!

Squatting was certainly common in London in the 70s, at least in part because inner london gentrification hadn't got going and so there were lots of empty, run down houses that it was not economical to let. There wasn't much opposition because nobody cared much about absentee landlords who had let the properties decay.


It's a bit different now - if you go looking for a place with a 'To Let' sign and then find an open window (yeah, right) and move in as a squatter, you're just a thief in all but name.

Best of luck Lady Jane, but if you're going to squat in a residential home, i'd get your skates on. Not long now until this will be criminalised.


As an aside, it's interesting to see the signs that are put up by squatters referring to Section 6 Criminal Law Act 1977 and warning not to use violence to enter premises are completely meaningless in most cases where squatters move into someone's residential home. Nothing stopping residential occupier from breaking into their own home.


Useful guidance here: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/1868817.pdf


Best make sure you pick a place where the owners are unlikely to force entry themselves...

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/house-and-home/property/squatters-rights--and-wrongs-2144131.html


This makes for an interesting read, for both sides of the debate... I personally disagree with squatting in this day and age where living costs are so expensive. Don't see why you should have the choice of opting out of paying via living in someone elses, albeit empty, house who IS paying for it. But hey, thats just my POV.

LadyJane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've received an enormous amount of private

> messages whereby friendly people have sent me

> local empty properties and I've been checking them

> out all day. Some even have TO RENT signs outside.

> Well a THANK YOU to all you. God Bless the soles

> of your shoes! Hopefully its not the old bill

> trying to bust my ass!


Oh Lordy.. you've overcooked it. Is this your first time?

pinkhalf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Appropo this thread, it turns out I need a new

> home for my several dogs on a string (mange,

> benefit claimants, never worked and carry

> immigrant fleas) - can anyone help me break into a

> small, overpriced workers cottage with designer

> furniture in East Dulwich and alienate all my

> neighbours? Please?


There is a very unpleasant racist anti immigrant tone here.

Great work LadyJane.

You probably haven't found a property as a result of this thread but it is one of the most entertaining threads for months.


Have you now moved into the derelict house on ED Grove? Someone is definitely squatting there now. Maybe too late if you aren't.


As a matter of interest, stories abound of squatters who end up doing up the place they are squatting in and the owners being very pleased with the results when the squatters actually move out. Is this ever true or just urban myths?

LadyJane you should try Clapham and Brixton, where many occupants of short life co op properties have been re housed and their co ops dissolved by Lambeth Council. Unfortunately Lambeth doesn't appear to be doing anything with the properties that they have emptied, so they're there empty, we know not for how long, but some have been unoccupied for over a year now. They're all in reasonable condition as the co ops were in occupancy for 30years, they have the basics, water, electric, gas, but are in danger of falling in to disrepair fast if left empty, so of you go!

This thread has given me a good laugh, well done LadyJane to making people sit up and take note.

I can see many spluttering and choking into their lattes.

BTW I think the concrete house has been reclaimed, I'm sure it was featured on a programme this morning as being brought up to scratch after 14 years.

nunheadbelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread has given me a good laugh, well done

> LadyJane to making people sit up and take note.

> I can see many spluttering and choking into their

> lattes.

> BTW I think the concrete house has been reclaimed,

> I'm sure it was featured on a programme this

> morning as being brought up to scratch after 14

> years.


AT LEAST 21 YEARS THAT I KNOW OF.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link (sorry duplicated!):  Today, more than 30 states from around the world will gather in Bogotá, Colombia, for the “Emergency Conference” to halt the Gaza genocide: the most ambitious multilateral response since Israel began its campaign of devastation two years ago. Bringing together a broad coalition of governments — from Algeria to Brazil, China to Spain, Indonesia to Qatar — the conference aims, in the words of Colombian President Gustavo Petro, “to move from condemnation to collective action.” At 10:30 Bogotá, 11:30 New York, 16:30 London and 17:30 Paris, we invite you to join this historic gathering's opening ceremony live from the Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. You will hear testimony from Dr. Thaer Ahmed, who will recount his experience of working in Rafah and Khan Younis amidst Israel’s genocide. Rosa Yolanda Villavicencio, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Colombia, will detail her government’s concrete commitments to uphold international law. After she was sanctioned by the Trump administration, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese will deliver a powerful message about the failure of the international system to protect the Palestinian people — and urge immediate and coordinated action by principled states. “Here in Bogotá, a growing number of states have the opportunity to break the silence and revert to a path of legality by finally saying: enough. Enough impunity. Enough empty rhetoric. Enough exceptionalism. Enough complicity,” Albanese will say. Today, the call from Bogotá will echo around the world. Join us. In solidarity,  The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • pm if you have any for sale
    • Yes, that was what I was thinking of, thanks!
    • It will always be King's on the Rye for me. This photo shows it early 20th century when it was known as King's Arms. The building was totally destroyed during WW2, rebuilt 1957 and renamed Kings on the Rye.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...