Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pearson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeez, we live in a global capital city...

> if you can't handle aircraft noise move to Orkney

> or somewhere else suitably quiet.


Peason: many other 'global capital cities' have a complete ban on night flights. In fact entire countries do. A ban on night flights does not seem correlated with poor economic performance in any sense. And we seem to be talking about 16 planes waking up hundreds of thousands of people too early, most (80%) days of the year. Not some occasional occurence.


oilworker: binmen never arrive before 5.30am! Not around this road, anyway. And that's once a week, not 80% of the year. Foxes is once in a blue moon; likewise cats fighting. Milkmen: have you seen a milkman since 1975?

I think the noise problem is intermittent in East Dulwich. When the planes are audible, there tends to be an almost continuous flow, with one flight increasing in volume as the previous one fades (really infuriating if you listen to this at 5 a.m. in the morning with a hangover). But there seem to be long periods when there are no planes at all. Maybe Heathrow has different flight plans in different seasons. The problem seems to be worst in summer, perhaps because it's holiday season?

We get the first flight of the morning from Singapore going directly over the roof at about 5:00am. Sometimes it wakes me up, sometimes it doesn't. It IS noisy.

But it's nowhere near as noisy as it was when I lived in Ealing. Trust me, a fully laden 747 taking off directly over your building which wasn't on a hill like the current one, makes a LOT more noise, and indeed vibration than one coming in to land depleted of fuel and on final approach. Plus on certain days they were taking off every 90 seconds or so. I agree we have the right to complain, but we'd also be the first to gripe about not having decent transport links as well.


It's one of those black or white issues, you are either bothered or you aren't. We pay the price of living near the busiest airport in the world. Back home in Yorkshire, rather than complain they all go out and point at the tin tube with wings in the sky. So long as the angle of approach isn't 90 degrees over SE22 I guess I'll put up with it. UNLESS they start doing 24 hour flights, now that would be a different matter.

On Overhill Rd, we get the first flight of the morning from Singapore going directly over the roof at about 5:00am. Sometimes it wakes me up, sometimes it doesn't. It IS noisy.

But it's nowhere near as noisy as it was when I lived in Ealing. Trust me, a fully laden 747 taking off makes a LOT more noise, and indeed vibration than one coming in to land depleted of fuel and on final approach. Plus on certain days they were taking off every 90 seconds or so. I agree we have the right to complain, but we'd also be the first to gripe about not having decent transport links as well.


It's one of those black or white issues, you are either bothered or you aren't. We pay the price of living near the busiest airport in the world. Back home in Yorkshire, rather than complain they all go out and point at the tin tube with wings in the sky. So long as the angle of approach isn't 90 degrees over SE22 I guess I'll put up with it. UNLESS they start doing 24 hour flights, now that would be a different matter.

The thing is that there's no real need to put up with it; the government could make some pretty simple changes which would have a large impact, e.g.

- steeper landings: London City planes land at 5 degrees, Heathrow land at 3 degrees. The difference would be that planes fly over Dulwich at 7000ft rather than 4000ft. Even if they made it 4 degrees it would make a significant difference at our distance from the airport.

- more variation of flight paths: if paths were varied enough such that people got 2 weekends out of 3 plane-free I think they'd be pretty happy.


Of course if they really wanted to sort Heathrow they'd build a new Boris-port in a suitable location by the coast where the noise wouldn't bother anyone (as they'd land over the sea); and the airlines could fly as many flights as they wanted with fewer delays, etc.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now when Concorde used to fly over - that was

> LOUD!

>

> I live under the old flight path as well - it was

> loud, but boy was it beatiful. My heart lifted

> everytime I saw it.


xxxxx


Same here.


If memory serves, it used to come over around 5pm, so sadly I wasn't often in to see it, but it was great when I was.


It was so sad when Concorde was grounded, what a beautiful plane.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In a previous thread on this subject, I believe it

> was said that the flight plan varies depending on

> wind direction? Or that it was varied to give

> residents of different areas some respite!

>

> Can't remember which though :-S


Planes fly into the wind to land at Heathrow. Prevailing UK winds are westerlies. So most of the time they fly in from the east, over ED.

  • 2 years later...

Top end of lordship lane and I'm struggling with the constant drone of aircraft noise.


This is new having been away over the summer and working abroad on my return I'm finding I'm being woken up from around 5 am with the rumble and high pitched scream of jet engines overhead maybe as low as 300 feet above and the are every 2 minutes.


At first I thought it was just me sleeping lightly but now I know it's a new experience.


What has changed to make the flight path now constant above east dulwich ?

Lived here for 50years and i love the sound of airplanes. I'm lost when i cant gaze up into the sky to see a big bird flying over. If you think its loud here, imagine living in Richmond or Hounslow. Just be thankful that the planes taking off don't come over Southwark. If you can't stand the heat...get out of the Kitchen!

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Years?

>

> This last few months is the first I've experienced

> the noise in my 40 year in the area I've never

> every previously been woken by aircraft noise.


xxxxxx


It's been bad for longer than the last few months.


Maybe your sleeping patterns have changed?

Some interesting info from the HACAN website, :


http://www.hacan.org.uk/resources/reports/living.under.the.heathrow.flight.path.today.pdf


http://www.hacan.org.uk/


http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f5432


"20% more chance of dying of stress-related diseases under Heathrow flight path". Serious!!

  • 1 month later...

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear! There's a parallel thread here:

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,837871

>

> I find it astounding that some residents haven't

> noticed that as the roar of one jet fades,

> another's rises - throughout the day, each and

> every day.


It's only been happening for the last 18 or so months once you realise you hear it constantly.


Been here 40 years and only now is it constant impossible to open windows in the summer.


I'm at the point where I've had enough.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fazer. Anti aircraft noise and pollution and

> congestion

>

> But pro car noise and etc etc

>

> Curbs against one are an outrage and against the

> other are A Priority



Car noise is no where near as intrusive it's moderate by comparison.


Aircraft noise is high pitched and goes through double glazing and solid walls.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...