Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Be warned, my friend yesterday was the target of 2 dodgy Big Issue sellers who stole her mobile phone from outside Liquorish. We were sitting in the sunshine and she rather stupidly had her phone on the table. 2 Asian women came up to us and were really pushy trying to sell us the Big Issue. They put the copies on the table and were shuffling them around - we told them to go away but they were really hassly. And about an hour later we realised the phone was missing. We have no proof it was them but they were the only people who came near the table. When my friend rang the police they said something like 20 phones had been stolen from East Dulwich over the past weekend so there's obviously something organised going on. I also remember that they didn't have Big Issue ID. So if anyone sees 2 Asian women wearing bright pink cardigans then steer clear...unless you want to buy a cheap phone that is! And if you want a copy of Big Issue go to the nice man that sells it by the traffic lights at Sainsburys

This is an old 'Scam'


Happened to me outside the Bishop last summer.


Someone comes up. Throws copy of Big Issue on table. (Covering your Mobile)


When you don't buy it, they pick the Mag. up along with your phone.


In my case it was my ipod. but I spotted the scam and retreived it before they could take it.

  • 1 month later...
U ALSO HAD MINE TAKEN OUT OF MY HAND AT CLAPHAM JUNCTION WAS SITTING DOWN CHATTING ON PHONE TWO BOYS CAME OVER ONE SAT NEXT ASKED IF I HAD A CIGERETTE AND THE OTHERE ONE GRABBED IT AND AWAY THEY WENT I COULD NOT GET THEM CALLED POLICE BUT NO AVAIL ALSO HAD BAG STOLEN AS WELL FROM MERICK ARMS WENT TO GO AND SING AND GIRL ROBBEDME NFRONT OF MY FACE I WAS SINGING AND THEY TOOK IT AND RUN AGAIN INSRANCE WONT PAY OUT AS I LEFT THE CHAIR UNATTENEND THEY HAVE EXUCES FDOR EVERY THNG DONT THEY BE CAREFULL AND VIGALANT AND DONT TRUST PEOPLE U DONT KNOW

Sorry to hear about this. It is as other posters have said an old, well-used con. I observed it sitting in a cafe in Regent Street. A Big Issue seller approached a table of tourists, putting his Big Issue on the table. When they refused to buy the Big Issue, the man left. A few minutes later the tourists realised the phone was missing and were really upset.


Shame really as it's a pretty natural thing to do to put your phone on the table - but I suppose you are advertising it to thieves... So sorry this happened to you. And very worrying and sinister if something organised is going on...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...