Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is there anything that can be done about vehicles which sit for ages churning out fumes?


I was sitting in my front bedroom and became aware of fumes filling the room, even though my windows were closed. I looked out of the window and there was a guy sitting right outside my house in a large van, on the phone with his engine running.


I went and asked him to turn it off and he wouldn't. I said the fumes were making me feel ill inside my house, and he told me that was my problem.


It was a Vauxhall Vivaro CDTI and I have the registration number. I presume he is working somewhere in this road or nearby.


Is there anything I can do about this? Is there any way of reporting it somewhere?


The pollution in this area is a real problem, and I have asthma. I hate to think what it is doing to all the small children round here whose lungs are still developing.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/168684-polluting-vehicles/
Share on other sites

It's a legal requirement to turn off the engine. Highway code rule 123

"You MUST NOT ... leave a vehicle engine running unnecessarily while that vehicle is stationary on a public road. Generally, if the vehicle is stationary and is likely to remain so for more than a couple of minutes, you should apply the parking brake and switch off the engine to reduce emissions and noise pollution."


Not sure how you can enforce it though.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only thing you can do is tackle it head-on,

> with a smile and an overabundance of politeness

> (and caution). If it is a firm, ring the head

> office if the driver doesn't do as you ask.



The van was unmarked, and the driver wouldn't tell me who he worked for.


And I'm afraid I was neither smiling nor cautious.


In fact when he wouldn't turn the engine off (and no, it wasn't a refrigerated van) and told me it was my problem if I was feeling ill from the fumes, I shouted at him :(


ETA: I'm not proud of this.


ETA: Thanks for that info Mark, I shall look it up, print it out, and keep copies about my person to hand to these polluting drivers in future. They shall all know The Wrath of Sue :))

EPB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it true that refrigerated vehicles have to keep

> their engines running in order to maintain the

> cooling system?


Not now. Quite a few run with just the ignition key turned on. Lots of trailers are self-contained units (not that an artic is likely to be in the side streets of ED!!).

I was in the playground of our local park (mayow park) recently with my 4 year old son.

An ice-cream van was parked there in the center of the park and less than 30 meters away from the gates of the playground.


The exhaust fumes of that antiquated diesel engine were VERY noticeable and unpleasant. (The noise too actually, but at least that is not detrimental to the health of my child)


I assume it stayed there, engine running for most of the day.


I will find a channel to complain about that to the council or whoever is in charge of authorizing it.


There is enough you can't do when it comes to reducing children's exposure to air pollution.





On a side note, I also have problems with the notion of tempting children with sugar and calories in places where they should exercise and be active.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a legal requirement to turn off the engine.

> Highway code rule 123

> "You MUST NOT ... leave a vehicle engine running

> unnecessarily while that vehicle is stationary on

> a public road. Generally, if the vehicle is

> stationary and is likely to remain so for more

> than a couple of minutes, you should apply the

> parking brake and switch off the engine to reduce

> emissions and noise pollution."


This is another example of where the Highway Code is not an accurate exposition of the law.


The relevant law can be found at Regulations 98 and 107 of The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mark Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a legal requirement to turn off the

> engine.

> > Highway code rule 123

> > "You MUST NOT ... leave a vehicle engine

> running

> > unnecessarily while that vehicle is stationary

> on

> > a public road. Generally, if the vehicle is

> > stationary and is likely to remain so for more

> > than a couple of minutes, you should apply the

> > parking brake and switch off the engine to

> reduce

> > emissions and noise pollution."

>

> This is another example of where the Highway Code

> is not an accurate exposition of the law.

>

> The relevant law can be found at Regulations 98

> and 107 of The Road Vehicles (Construction and

> Use) Regulations 1986.


I'm reminded of this every time I walk past the two Southwark camera spy cars parked on Lordship Lane every day, with their engines running, to make profit for APCOA.

Looking at Southwark's website they are interested in people reporting engine idling 'hotspots' to them, nothing about one-offs. Would help address engine idling around schools at least, if people report it.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/air-quality/reporting-air-quality-complaints

This might also be of interest, for anyone wanting to actively try to tackle it - they run action events in 15 boroughs including Southwark in partnership with local council - provide training and then pair people up to approach car drivers idling to try and encourage them to change their behaviour.


https://idlingaction.london/

New vehicles automatically cut out the engine when stationary and restart it when the brake comes off. In the future, all vehicles will do this. The law does not seem to be clear from Edhistory's post but it is always a good idea to count to ten when frustrated, and then be calm when asking for something. It tends to bring the helpful side out of a person more often than not. At least we are no longer burning coal fires and having to battle with smog every other day. The technology to get rid of vehicle pollution is already there. It will just take time for it to work through new vehicle sales.

nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "At least we are no longer burning coal fires and

> having to battle with smog every other day"

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/2

> 9/wood-burning-stove-ban-will-not-be-enforced-agai

> nst-householders


Khan could easily make an impact here, by banning garages and stores from selling poor quality soft wood logs. Along with illegal bituminous house coal.

If you have the right wood burning appliance and kiln dried wood at sub 20% then the emmissions are within the confines of the law. I understand DEFFRA are to issue a 'ready to burn' standard for wood.


I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that coal stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to burn, why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

It's not exactly hidden from view.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that coal

> stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to burn,

> why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

> It's not exactly hidden from view.



It isn't coal, is it?


It's smokeless fuel.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that coal

> > stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to burn,

> > why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

> > It's not exactly hidden from view.

>

>

> It isn't coal, is it?

>

> It's smokeless fuel.


Yes REAL coal often. So often I'm gobsmacked to say.


Along with smokeless fuel.

If you want to moan about polluting vehicles and Khans mission to clean the air then why not also ask TFL to get bus drivers to switch off their engines (or switch to electric mode for the hybrids) when buses "wait for a short time to regulate the service"


Madness that they sit there for up to five minutes pumping out fumes when this happens

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Seabag Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > >

> > > I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that

> coal

> > > stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to

> burn,

> > > why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

>

> > > It's not exactly hidden from view.

> >

> >

> > It isn't coal, is it?

> >

> > It's smokeless fuel.

>

> Yes REAL coal often. So often I'm gobsmacked to

> say.

>

> Along with smokeless fuel.



Who is selling coal round here?

bels123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This might also be of interest, for anyone wanting

> to actively try to tackle it - they run action

> events in 15 boroughs including Southwark in

> partnership with local council - provide training

> and then pair people up to approach car drivers

> idling to try and encourage them to change their

> behaviour.

>

> https://idlingaction.london/


Good idea to pair people up..

I had a cab outside mine with the engine running while he ate his lunch and read the paper. There should be a reporting system for cabs

This is not new

http://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/news/crime-court/drivers-who-leave-motor-running-in-islington-will-be-fined-in-first-idling-campaign-in-the-country-1-3707742

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have lost my black Nokia phone. Somewhere in Ashbourne Grove towards the shops. If found please send a Whattsapp message on: 07983333412. Thank you
    • A couple of interesting - albeit anecdotal - letters to the Grauniad today about what I think is more useful question about private schools' conduct and response as institutions, and whether they have changed in the interim. Excerpt: the private schools which were built to train young Englishmen for empire-building were deeply racist even in the 1980s. Mine had a quota for the maximum number of Jewish pupils... I say this not to defend Farage, but to point out that he – and many others from a similar background – were schooled in an environment that condoned or even encouraged blatant racism, while also equipping the pupils with the swagger, charm and polish to make others feel inferior and admiring of them. To see him in isolation is to miss the nature of the sorts of institutions that educated him, and the damage they do. I’m sure the schools will say they have changed, and I hope they have, but while they continue to educate their pupils to believe they are better than others, there will be plenty more where Farage came from. The Dulwich College "rape culture" allegations certainly seem to be consistent with an institutional culture of making its pupils feel better than others - albeit girls and women in those cases rather than Jews and Muslims. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/nov/26/racism-claims-against-nigel-farage-are-no-surprise-to-us
    • 1) local government and central government are both just different parts of government 2) if anyone is stuck in the nightmare position of having an unsaleable £2m house in Dulwich, don't suffer in silence. Reach out to me - I'll buy it from you next week for £1m. The community is ready to rally around and support you! 🙏🙏🙏
    • Despite making over £500k gain for doing nothing other than living in the house I bought, this budget is barely affecting me at all.  Meanwhile I watch under 30s struggle to afford rent in shared houses while I look back to the happy days when us boomers could buy a two bed flat in East Dulwich on a single salary.  It's stupidly unfair, and the only way to make it fair will be for the government to redistribute some of this unearned wealth - otherwise, just wait till the angry Millennials get into power.  A property tax seems like the fairest way to do this.    p.s. I was expecting that the Government WOULD put up property taxes on houses like mine.  Maybe they will one day.  Seems fair to me.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...