Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wicked afternoon yesterday, and great crowd. Loved

> the Fernandez song to the tune of ABBA's Fernando.


That was hilarious. The Rabble were on top form. Just under 2,000 there. Great day out and up to third. Woo!

Took my German father-in-law who was visiting from Berlin on Saturday. He loved everything about it - the atmosphere, mix of ages and m/f ratio in the crowd, standard of football on show etc etc. Anyone reading this who hasn't been to see DHFC before, come along, It's always a great day out.

Listeners to the Guardian's excellent Football Weekly podcast yesterday will have heard the Hamlet get a mention around the 39.30 mark in relation to Non League Day. Warning - contains "hipster" reference from Barry Glendenning.


edit - I tried to include a link but the forum software wouldn't let me for some reason..

  • 2 weeks later...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And getting there by beating the team that were

> top and on a 7 match win streak.


I know, they're fantastic at the moment. And have you seen the GD? I must admit, I had a little snigger when my mate told me...tee hee...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
    • Fernando came and sorted out our very overgrown garden.  He is a very friendly chap, works meticulously and charges very fair prices.   We’ve been using his Services for many years now and will continue to do so.    Here are his contact details if you have any gardening questions: Fernando - 07946 757938       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...