Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably won't be all-ticket ? their biggest crowd

> this season was 331, in a 4000-capacity stadium.

> Hoping for coaches, otherwise it's a drive and no

> beer...


So can someone from Dulwich Hamlet confirm if we'll be OK to justturn up without a ticket please?

bargee99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?10 return from Fenchurch Street to

> Stanford-le-hope which is a mile from the ground.

> Trains every 1/2 hour both ways takes 50 mins.

> Walk, cab or #100 bus to the ground.


Thank you for that very helpful info. bargee99. (tu)


It's TODAY folks. 3pm KO. THE PLAYOFF FINAL.


COME ON YOU PINK AND BLUES!!!

Far too many unanswered questions about the future running of the Club to say that this is the only option. As exemplified by this:

"...?A strong YES vote sends an emphatic message that our Club is gearing up for a safe and secure future under some form of supporter ownership."


Er, so it's emphatic, but only about 'some form' of supporter ownership. That doesn't fill me with any confidence, given the rocky history of the club's management. And to say that supporter ownership will be 'dead in the water' unless members vote yes is unsubstantiated arm-twisting.


The plain truth is that the club has not seriously explored any options that weren't already put on the table by Hadley Property Group.

Chief Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really are a top top DHFC supporter, Otta!

> Pathetic.

>

. WTF Chief. Have you never been so preoccupied that things have completly slipped from your mind?


Anyway shame about the result but hey Dulwich did well to get to the finals.

Chief Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really are a top top DHFC supporter, Otta!

> Pathetic.

>

> "Wow, didn't realise it was today. Go Dulwich!

> Can't believe I've not been to a match in 2016.

> Bloody kids."





I've never claimed to be a top supporter. I go when my life allows it. Before Christmas it allowed it a lot, since Christmas it hasn't at all. Simple as that really.



Why I'm bothering to explain myself to a sad little person like you I've no idea though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...