Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably won't be all-ticket ? their biggest crowd

> this season was 331, in a 4000-capacity stadium.

> Hoping for coaches, otherwise it's a drive and no

> beer...


So can someone from Dulwich Hamlet confirm if we'll be OK to justturn up without a ticket please?

bargee99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?10 return from Fenchurch Street to

> Stanford-le-hope which is a mile from the ground.

> Trains every 1/2 hour both ways takes 50 mins.

> Walk, cab or #100 bus to the ground.


Thank you for that very helpful info. bargee99. (tu)


It's TODAY folks. 3pm KO. THE PLAYOFF FINAL.


COME ON YOU PINK AND BLUES!!!

Far too many unanswered questions about the future running of the Club to say that this is the only option. As exemplified by this:

"...?A strong YES vote sends an emphatic message that our Club is gearing up for a safe and secure future under some form of supporter ownership."


Er, so it's emphatic, but only about 'some form' of supporter ownership. That doesn't fill me with any confidence, given the rocky history of the club's management. And to say that supporter ownership will be 'dead in the water' unless members vote yes is unsubstantiated arm-twisting.


The plain truth is that the club has not seriously explored any options that weren't already put on the table by Hadley Property Group.

Chief Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really are a top top DHFC supporter, Otta!

> Pathetic.

>

. WTF Chief. Have you never been so preoccupied that things have completly slipped from your mind?


Anyway shame about the result but hey Dulwich did well to get to the finals.

Chief Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really are a top top DHFC supporter, Otta!

> Pathetic.

>

> "Wow, didn't realise it was today. Go Dulwich!

> Can't believe I've not been to a match in 2016.

> Bloody kids."





I've never claimed to be a top supporter. I go when my life allows it. Before Christmas it allowed it a lot, since Christmas it hasn't at all. Simple as that really.



Why I'm bothering to explain myself to a sad little person like you I've no idea though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...