Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just received this email, so thought I'd share. Of course all are welcome to attend

Dear All ,


I?d like to invite you to the Peckham Rye Common Paddling Pool Stakeholder Meeting on Monday 22nd October at Harris Sports Centre (Homestall Road, London SE22).




The meeting will start at 7:30pm and we will aim to finish at 9pm. There will be refreshments and an opportunity to speak to council officers.




Key items for Monday 22nd October meeting include:


? Feasibility study for Splash Park & Consultancy

? Agree on a project timetable

? Steering Group, format, members, roles & responsibility

? Introduction to the Playful Ideas Big Lottery Fund




As this is a project aimed at children and young people, we encourage you to invite and bring along young people who will want to be a part of the development of this project. The meeting will be a mixture of small group work and feedback to make it more interactive and allow more people to have the opportunity to input into the meeting.


I hope you can make it on Monday 22nd October and I look forward to seeing you then.




Please feel free to give me a ring in the meantime, or email me, if you have any questions about the meeting.






Yours sincerely,


Rachael Bannerman

Project Support Officer - CGS Team

Southwark Council

Environment & Housing Dept

186 Walworth Road

London SE17 1JJ

Sorry to add something possibly constructive.


But if this thing is a splash park then surely we are talking young kids etc. Is 7.30pm to 9.pm not a bit late? or not very inclusive for children ? would a saturday afternoon not attract more interest ?

boosboss Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Please feel free to give me a ring in the

> meantime, or email me, if you have any questions

> about the meeting.

> >

> Yours sincerely,

>

> Rachael Bannerman

> Project Support Officer - CGS Team

> Southwark Council

> Environment & Housing Dept

> 186 Walworth Road

> London SE17 1JJ



What's her email address?

DG Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

or email me, if you have any

> questions

> > about the meeting.

> > >

> > Yours sincerely,

> >

> > Rachael Bannerman

> > Project Support Officer - CGS Team

>>

>

> What's her email address?


Oops! It's [email protected]

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to add something possibly constructive.

>

> But if this thing is a splash park then surely we

> are talking young kids etc. Is 7.30pm to 9.pm not

> a bit late? or not very inclusive for children ?

> would a saturday afternoon not attract more

> interest ?



Good point and one that you may wish to take up with Rachael Bannerman

As an established member, who obviously has a good rapor and a direct line of communication would it not be wise, if you think it is a good point to mention it to her yourself. I am sure you would be must better equipped to understand the local politics of it all.

The meeting was generally positive, with a handful of kids in attendance. The object of the meeting was more about working out a timescale for the project and organising a steering group to work out the finer details and how the consultation should progress, than anything. Overall a splash pool was to be the primary idea for the improvement of the site, but other aspects and additions such as play equipment and landscaping were also discussed. There was some discussion as to alternative locations for a splash pool if the old paddling pool site was not ideal, but these were not viewed any further than being suggestions. One of the biggest hurdles will be financing and where funding can be obtained from. One of the main problems with funding is that a lot of sources may regard the project as a council responsibilty and less of a needy cause etc. But many funding avenues are still yet to be explored. The project team came up with a programme completion date of mid-summer 2008. However, I don't see this as being realistic as there's still so much to do. The Nunhead and Peckham Rye Community council are fully behind the project and are keen to see it materialise as soon as possible. The Friends of Peckham Rye Park, The Peckham Society, Southwark Councils Parks Dept and Play Services all had representatives in attendance. Some of the main concerns expressed were the running costs (staffing and maintenance), environmental issues (mains or recycled water)and weather dependant usage.

Overall the project is being viewed positively, but still needs lots of local support and involvement. The meetings are 'open' meetings and it would be nice to see them better attended. I will endeavour to update as regularly as I get more information.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi I've just started a little side line doing Japanese head spa in Walworth SE17, it a very nice relaxing treatment which promotes hair growth de-stress and detox a long hair play what is done with jade tools. also all natural hair shampoo conditioner mask. Then you also have a relaxing facial with the fountain experience and steam pure bliss call for appointments 07903 544905
    • Just go to the park like everyone else who didn’t buy a ticket. 
    • I was lucky enough to go to Japan earlier in the year and late one night ended up having to drunkenly navigate my way back to the hotel using my phone. I was briefly nervous, then realised I was in Japan and they don't really do street crime/phone snatching and all was fine. My point being, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about safety in London, but I wonder if I/we have got so used to being on edge (holding bags/phones close) we don't give it much conscious thought. And yes, as mostly a pedestrian if there was less traffic crime my life would be a lot calmer!
    • There’s an interesting discussion to be had on the need for infrastructure generally and on bottlenecks in specific areas, as noted above. However on new houses specifically, I’ve never understood the infrastructure argument. The people to go in the new houses already exist and are already using infrastructure. Thanks to twenty years of under-building we’ve got millions of adults stuck living with parents, living in house shares, paying a fortune to rent cramped flats etc - that’s what a housing crisis is. They’re presumably all using road/trains, showering and weeing whilst doing so. Building them houses doesn’t necessarily increase the need for infrastructure much, if at all. The Abundance Agenda podcast is a great listen if you’re interested in this stuff.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...