Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A cyclist was sent flying by a passenger door opening outside Harris Boys ED just after 8am this morning. Hats off the teachers and others outside the school who helped him. I hope you're OK if you happen to read this. If you need a witness, I was about 15metres behind you.

Opening car doors with the "Dutch reach" should be taught here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/the-dutch-reach-how-opening-car-door-like-the-dutch-could-save-lives-cycling/


It's about opening the left door with your right hand, and viceversa, as this forces you to look at the oncoming traffic.

No idea if it was the case in this instance but schools at dropping off time are very hairy places for cyclists as kids tend to erupt from cars on both sides without looking. It'd be very helpful if drivers could keep childproof locks/central locking on until they'd checked themselves, then let the kids out. Hope this rider's OK.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > People who do that should lose their licence

> > forever

>

> Could have been a rear seat passenger (without a

> licence) getting out the car.


I've seen this happen with black cabs.

Long time ago when I chaired Southwark Cyclists TfL gave me stats showing in London 11% of cycling killed and seriously injured are from being 'doored'.

Cycle Training advice is to cycle further out to avoid this happening to you. Equally car occupants are duty bound to properly look to avoid taking people out.

jimlad48 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > People who do that should lose their licence

> > forever

>

> Accidents happen. That seems a total overreaction

> to an unfortunate situation.


Jimlad, aside from the punishment, checking for cyclists is a "you MUST" in the Highway Code:


http://www.highwaycode.info/waiting-and-parking/waiting-and-parking-239


..so I think the blame is on the people in the car. And if the car's not obviously parked up to let people out, that makes it impossible for someone filtering past to anticipate a door opening. Dangerous stuff that should be more severely punished than it is, I reckon.

Happened to me many years ago on the Old Kent Road. I went over the handlebars and car door and fortunately not under the travelling car that my bicycle then hit. That driver had no wing mirror, was stopped in a bus lane and didn't look properly. The driver of the other car, that was damaged by my bicycle, was furious with him and called the Police. In the end he was fined and given points.


Hope the young lad is ok and more importantly, is not put off from cycling as a result. It is the responsibility of the driver to make sure it is safe for passengers to exit their vehicle and hopefully a lesson has been learned there too.

The vast majority of drivers do all their loading kids and parcels on the street side doors. Why? Every day I see kids sent to load themselves through the street side door or parents loading babies into car seats from the street side door of the car. The complete illogic of this and the near universal fact leaves me incredulous.
I load children. I NEVER load street side. I always load pavement side. This is a no brainer that 99 in 100 adults do not get and I am dumbfounded (while I appreciate that you and those 99 adults would just call me dumb. Go figure, which is why I bring it up. Please explain. Just move your car seat. Let the children scoot to the seat side. Lean in.) All those wide open doors into streets forcing wide manoeuvres. Wide open doors with butts poking way way out while adults carefully adjust safety straps and harnesses.
Firstly, I don't call people dumb. Nor did I anywhere above. I expressed a perfectly reasonable point of view with which you are certainly free to disagree. I have an average sized saloon car and, with two car seats in place, there is no way for a child to exit the car on the opposing side without removing one of them. I don't admonish parents, most of whom are just trying to make it through the day as best they can. Until they make it possible to mount two carseats on the same side of a vehicle, I believe most of us will continue to do just that.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> how is it an accident pray? Stupid driver intent

> on getting kid into school doesn't check mirrors

> etc.....NOT a bloody accident imvho



Are you suggesting the person in the car did this intentionally? Obviously I'm unaware of all the details but I'd be surprised if the door was opened on purpose in order to hurt the cyclist. It's true this sort of incident is easily preventable and deserves some punishment but losing their license is extreme.

walkman85 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > how is it an accident pray? Stupid driver

> intent

> > on getting kid into school doesn't check

> mirrors

> > etc.....NOT a bloody accident imvho

>

>

> Are you suggesting the person in the car did this

> intentionally? Obviously I'm unaware of all the

> details but I'd be surprised if the door was

> opened on purpose in order to hurt the cyclist.

> It's true this sort of incident is easily

> preventable and deserves some punishment but

> losing their license is extreme.


Totally agree - there are a tiny minority of drivers who do seem to delight in making cyclists lives a misery and they should be prosecured to the full extent of the law. BUT, these are very much the minority.


By all means ban drivers if it happens, but perhaps we could also introduce cycling licences and ban cyclists who do things like jumping red lights, riding on pavements or other dangerous behaviour that injures and kills pedestrians?

Was the cyclist "undertaking" ie. cycling past between the car and the pavement? My husband nearly had an incident with a cyclist who was doing just this - even though I was indicating left and had pulled in (I thought) very close to the pavement to drop him at the station.


I'm not victim blaming I hope but there are times when a passenger in a car might not think it was necessary to look behind them when opening the car door.

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm not victim blaming I hope but there are times

> when a passenger in a car might not think it was

> necessary to look behind them when opening the car

> door.


There's no time when anyone in a car shouldn't check behind them before opening a door! Whether a cyclist/motorcyclist or even pedestrian should or should not be there, they might be, err on the side of caution for your own sake (a friend had her wrist broken by a filtering motorcyclist ? insurance companies decided 50-50, she should have looked more closely, he shouldn't have gone so fast into a too narrow gap).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...