Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If that many birds are killed then it is because they were the weakest in their group and - like the wildebeest brought down by the lion - their loss strengthens the gene pool.


We all adore a chirpy tit

Long tailed blue or great;

But surely any stupid tit

Should be consigned to fate.


[Expurgated chapter from: Birds of Britain, J.L. Bonhote, 1907.]

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If that many birds are killed then it is because

> they were the weakest in their group and - like

> the wildebeest brought down by the lion - their

> loss strengthens the gene pool.

>

Wildebeest and crocodile are indigenous to where they prey or are preyed upon, and both have adopted different survival strategies over along period of time (the strategy of wildebeest being security and survival through sheer numbers).

the problem with cats is that their numbers have increased dramatically because people have acquired them in large quantities and let them roam and destroy a varied habitat.


As for mice and rats other pest control measures exist.

"the problem with cats is that their numbers have increased dramatically because people have acquired them in large quantities and let them roam and destroy a varied habitat."


What habitat is that exactly? The man-made habitat of suburbia? If you look at the decline in UK birds numbers it is mainly down to changes in farming practices, loss of suitable nesting sites and climate - and that most of the birds affected are from rural and woodland areas. Cats do not enter the picture in any significant way at all and the point I was making was a general one about predator and prey. The RSPB puts it better:


"Despite the large numbers of birds killed, there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK-wide. This may be surprising, but many millions of birds die naturally every year, mainly through starvation, disease, or other forms of predation. There is evidence that cats tend to take weak or sickly birds."

200,000 birds a day killed by cats in UK.

1,400,000 birds a week.

42 million birds a month.

504 million (half a billion) birds a year.


Strange, I live in a neighbourhood frequented by cats and don't see even a tiny portion of the dead-bird mountain that's allegedly being created by cats.


Rubbish original statistic IMO. No empirical evidence, just a figure conjured up in the research labs of Analville, TN.

Anyway, think of the relief the worms are getting with 200,000 dead birds a day in UK. No-one thinks of the worms do they, just because they're not feathered and can't sing sweet songs. Biased OP, it's anti-cats, ignores plight of worms.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 200,000 birds a day killed by cats in UK.

> 1,400,000 birds a week.

> 42 million birds a month.

> 504 million (half a billion) birds a year.

>

200 000 x 365 = 73 000 000 good with words, not so with figures.

get back to your bank

Well, let's have a think.


Our cat does half a dozen birds or so a year.. (that we know of, though she's usually most keen to share)


Assuming 7 million cats in the uk, assuming some will be stone killers and some namby-pamby wuss-cats; assuming they hit their bird-killing, beak-twisting stride when they're still youngish and then lose their touch..


I'm gonna have a stab and say more like 50,000 birds. 50k Dead birds.

I've lived with cats for every day of my many years on this planet....not one has ever brought home a bird....lot's of mice and rats yes...but never a bird. And KK is right to ask how was this figure of 200,000 was arrived at.


Sounds like you have a 'real' moggie there *bob* :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...