Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Of course Keef, there would be a bottle of JD on the bar just for you.


Mr Palaeologus there will NOT be a health spa. There would however be a really cool (free) juke box and Liverpool games would take precedent over whatever else is on. (Hmmm, perhaps I could have a quiet room.......)

Hurrah :)-D


Table footy, and a pool table (but not with a stupid winner stays on rule so you can never just have a game with your mate if like me, you're a bit crap), and a dart board, and decks of cards and board games behind the bar, and barmaids who can't resist the name Keef.... Is that all okay?


God I almost want Anna to win the lottery more than me!

Quiet Room and cool pub dog - sounds interesting, as long as the dog isnt the scroffulous Mutt that DM keeps in her handbag.


Local bands night would be good, as long as they were as good as the combo at the Keef wedding.


If you dont make profits - what will you drink? I thought that was the whole point of owning a pub.

Yes, but my favourite work is behind a bar. I'd just like to run a cool pub and if I won the lottery it wouldn't matter if I only broke even.


The quiet room is for those who like to watch the football without someone nattering in their ear for the whole game about irrelevant stuff. i.e. not the game being played!!


Anyway, stop being sensible Michael - the title is "If you won the lottery.....". I have zero chance as I don't even buy a ticket. ;-)

I would build a huuuuuge football watching room with multiple TVs - where all the footie fans could watch their beloved teams. Once in, I would shut the door - and let them get on with it and leave the rest of us in peace.


How the footie fans would get on with the multiple Transvestities I dont know - but it would make an interesting experiment.

I'd get the house decorated. Buy out the tosser who lives next door, or buy some to get rid of him...and knock it through.


Then I'd buy a Mercedes Gullwing, W111 Coupe, W123 Coupe and get a V8 dropped into it, and get Austin A40 professionally restored.


Other than that, a Tag Heuer, a 600mm F4 Canon L Series, and then a 'Blad H3DII with lenses.

I want a simple life....


E

I'd buy the CPT, a small flat somewhere near the river, and a house in southern California. I'd live in California, but obviously have weekends out in London every once in a while.


I'd put a bunch of the money in an established design group and work there from time to time. :-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...