Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lies lies lies. Camberwell is quiet, McDonalds is busy, all other shops closed it seems. No fires, no sirens, no youths, no trouble. Anyone care to elaborate on how they got this "intelligence"?


Also, did it occur to anyone with regard to the sirens racing through East Dulwich towards Camberwell, that there's a rather large hospital in that direction that you may have heard of?

Annie N Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> McDonalds on fire. all businesses being shut down

> in Camberwell


Hi Annie


Have you actually seen the fire... ??


Twitter suggest there is no fire in Camberwell.


Please I appeal to posters here not to spread hearsy.


Fox

I've just come down through south London via Elephant, Walworth Road, Camberwell Green, LL, on the buses. I had heard - on the Guardian website - that there was trouble on Denmark Hill/outside MacDonalds, with looting and people taking shelter in local shops. Nothing going on when I got there - 2.20 - but most shops (80%) had the shutters down or half down (100% up in Camberwell Rd). Lots of damage around junction East St/Walworth Rd, and people doing repairs (including the Sally Army shop). Shops on Denmark Hill mostly shut. Some businesses on Champion Hill (?) also shut. Lots of hold-ups, traffic, police cars, sirens blazing, as soon as came over brow of hill into ED. Atmosphere on LL felt somewhat ugly/odd, and some strange types around (not your normal ED LL experience). Plough shops being advised to close.


35 and 176 buses running okay 30 minutes ago. But things seem to be changing minute by minute.

Just to be clear.


Sydenham Rd is fine. Shops shut as a precaution.


Kirkfdale is fine. One shop has boarded up one window.


Other than that it's a bit " locked down " like a ghost town really.



Though after dark, who knows.



NETTE

OK - A quick Twitter summary (so treat with usual caution):


- ED, Camberwell, Sydenham, Penge, Putney, Richmond - all shut down but no sign of trouble

- McDonalds in Camberwell was never on fire

- False rumour starting that Kings is evacuating

- Plenty of police but nothing happening on Walworth Road

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK - A quick Twitter summary (so treat with usual

> caution):

>

> - ED, Camberwell, Sydenham, Penge, Putney,

> Richmond - all shut down but no sign of trouble

> - McDonalds in Camberwell was never on fire

> - False rumour starting that Kings is evacuating

> - Plenty of police but nothing happening on

> Walworth Road


Yeah, McDonalds was most certainly not on fire an hour after that rumour went out. I changed from 35 to 176 without problems, though some old Rasta guy who got on the bus and sang the whole way to ED about fire and burning was a little unnerving ;-)

I went out to put the bins out and saw two police officers patrolling the beat down my road. (It was lovely to see actually... such a shame about the reason why they were actually doing it!) I asked them how things were in general and they informed me that there were youths gathering in Sydenham and Crystal Palace but that they had heard nothing about East Dulwich as yet. They were being updated every 15 mins by radio. Their advice was to stay indoors.

Hello,


I work at the Maudlsey Hospital. We were told about 3.00pm this afternoon to cancel all patients, and make our way home, due to rumours of problems in Camberwell.


I cycled home via Denmark Hill, Ruskin Park, Herne Hill and Brockwell Park to Brixton Hill around 3.30, and saw no trouble. Cannot confirm is anything is / isn't going on in Camberwell.

nailil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just got off the 'phone with a local tradesman who

> informed met hat the police are shutting down

> Lordship Lane.


xxxxx


Well that's just not true because I spoke to a police man and woman patrolling Lordship Lane, around 3pm, and there is no way that they are shutting places down, in fact they said it was "business as usual" and if people chose to close down that was up to them.


They had no info at all re any reason for anywhere on Lordship Lane to close down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...