Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is a petition on the HM Government website asking that any persons convicted of criminal acts during the current London riots should have all financial benefits removed. No tax payer should have to contribute to those who have destroyed property, stolen from their community and shown a disregard for the country that provides for them.


Here's the link in case anyone on the forum is interested in signing it: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/7337

Surely they should be given community order sentences and forced to make good the damage they've done? Might even learn a useful skill and become, shock horror, a useful member of society. Punishment should fit the crime.


Withdrawing benefits will, as Rosie and Jaybee point out, just make matters worse.

Community service sounds like an excellent idea - as long as the number of hours is up in the thousands.


We can't start preventing child criminals from receiving benefits in the future, the repercussions could be disastrous. But in answer to the question "how are they going to eat with no legal source of income"... one radical idea might be to get something called a "job", which can provide an income to cover essentials such as fried chicken, trainers, and xbox games. In order to prepare for this, they might want to consider occasionally attending something known as a "school".

Well there's that. But I'm talking in the immediate. Those who are already on benefits, how do they eat until such time as they've improved themselves? And how do you factor in for unemployment levels?


And as a matter of fact, what these kids (& adults) did, while awful, for the most part wasn't murder, rape, paedophilia. But we're ok with people convicted of those crimes getting benefits right?


This petition is idiotic. It's knee-jerk, and I don't mind that so much, I think we're all pretty fucking angry right now, but that's why I'm glad I don't get to pass sentence, because if I did I'd have them all in leg irons breaking rocks.

"Most of them looked very young, and I don't believe in writing individuals off."


And right there that's the problem - given whatever circumstances have got them to where they are (family? drugs? peers? whatever) are unlikely to change, it takes money and time to turn that around (youth centres, programmes etc) - all in the face of hostility ("you love those punks more than you love law-abiding citizens" etc) from the choir


I'm not making excuses for anyone - a plague on every participant in the riots - but riots like this weeks don't happen all the time for a bunch of reasons. And one of those reasons is that a small band of commited people recognise that many kids are broken 9for whatever reason) and try and grub around for funding to keep them busy. If it stops rioting, it's cheap at twice the price, even if it appears to be "soft"

Sure there is a lack of opportunity for these children, and this should be made available - but there is also a lack of responsibility; from the kids, from their parents, schools, and authority for failing to "civilise" them. Put simply in my view noone has ever said no to them in any meaningful way, but simply endulged them - this ultimately harms both the child and society. Billions have been pumped into inner cities, to what effect? Its time to review our approach to urban youth, sure make opportunity available, but take a much stricter approach to wrong doing and anti-social behaviour.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And how are they going to eat with no legal source

> of income?



Who gives a sh1t. How are the people who lost their businesses and homes going to eat?!


I also think their belongings should be sold at auction to pay for the damage. Like what the Criminal Assets Bureau do to drug barons in Ireland.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy, would you employ the little bastards?

>

> Chances of their getting a job are slim - whether

> by dint of their own fecklessness, criminal

> record, or unemployment. I'm not being bleeding

> heart about this, I'm being entirely pragmatic.



In some States in America they force you to take a job. I'm sure something like that could be implemented here. Something like street cleaning or government run factories making goods.

yay - several posts outlining the problem with the OP's petition and they come back with "Who gives a sh1t. "


wise....


(emotionally it's most of our gut reaction, I admit that. But you don't have to think for much longer to start to see the flaws) But it seems even 2 seconds more thought is beyond you

Can we take away their human rights...? After all this is what this is about. They riot, loot, burn and deprive innocent people of their basic human rights purely because they can. The police have no jurisdiction over what they do, their hands are tied by the plasticuffs of human rights. Having been involved in the judicial system for far too many years and been asked by rapists, paedophiles, murderers and generally the cream of England?s shyte to be given respect, all I could do was shake my head and walk away. Respect is earned, it is a perspective of how you feel about someone or something else not what you demand of others. There is no answer to this, no quick fix. The human rights act, the nanny nation and the, politically correct crazies have caused this. Human rights?????.. Who the hell for eh?

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yay - several posts outlining the problem with the

> OP's petition and they come back with "Who gives a

> sh1t. "

>

> wise....

>

> (emotionally it's most of our gut reaction, I

> admit that. But you don't have to think for much

> longer to start to see the flaws) But it seems

> even 2 seconds more thought is beyond you


Read what I just wrote about people who lost their homes and jobs. How are they going to eat?

Yep - repercussions should be meaningful and strong - that I agree with


I'm siding with the long community sentence thing, as well as the restoration of any groups which have recentlly had their funding cut to deal with people like this. primarily because it's more sucessful AND cheaper than employing more police and just hoping it doesn't happen again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A festival-style trolley that will fit in a hatch back. For moving son into halls at uni with a very far away car park!  Thanks    Lottie   
    • Hi, my daughter has a basic electric keyboard she really should clear out of her old room. It's a classic beginners one. Are you interested?  If so, I'll photograph it and find the name.    Lottie 
    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...