Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > matthew123 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > red devil Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Scholes 9 Lucas 0

> > >

> > > Hahaha - I wonder if Scholes is being tee'd

> up

> > for

> > > Footballer of the Year, with Fletcher getting

> > the

> > > PFA joke award. If Scholes and Fletcher

> played

> > for

> > > any other Club they'd get 2 yellow cards each

> > > every game before half time.

> >

> >

> > Now I wonder what would have happened if I had

> > said that?

>

> *rolls eyes and ignores it...*



Try and be original you've already been beaten to the punch on that one. Nice to see supporters of the real Manchester club on the forum now.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Scholes is a good player, who like Gazza before

> him, couldn't tackle, which is a weakness of his

> game, but I don't think you can say he's

> maliciously dirty.



Oh course the alternative view is that if you know you can't tackle as long as you have a hole in your bottom, which is the case with Scholes, then you shouldn't try to tackle cos the chances are you will fail, catch someone, and either get carded or sent off, so the fact you already know this smacks of intent everytime he makes a daft attempt at a tackle. Ask Reyes if he thinks Scholes is a nice clean player.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

>

> Nice to see supporters of the real Manchester club

> on the forum now.

>

> Just wondering how long it's going to take you to

> slag them off too. It seems to be your raison

> d'?tre on this thread to dismiss everyone but your

> beloved Arsenal.


Not at all, we gave them Adebayor, which I think was very nice of us (mind the ?25Mill was nice to). Your trouble is you're so cynical, I'm a nice likeable sort when you get to know me.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Irony obviously never made it over to Woolwich...

>

> Edited to remove all the previous crap...


Irony certainly didn't make it to Salford, or Trafford Business Park. And the next one please.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Atila Reincarnate wrote

>

>

> Try and be original you've already been beaten to

> the punch on that one. Nice to see supporters of

> the real Manchester club on the forum now.


Cheers Atila, I doubt you would have said that if I was here in September- Lovely goal by Ade in the 79th min !

And we shall see what is said next Thursday when we dump you out of the League Cup !

Surprised with that as after losing first 7 (with a threadbare team) they looked to be bouncing back. 7 points from their last 6 league games is a better return than Rafa at Liverpool. But that's football isn't it.


Maybe he has been ousted for Avram Grant who did a good job down at Chelsea.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anna hasn't been around for a while...again.

> Does anyone know whether she's gone to support her

> team (and manager) in Hungary tonight?..



She's fed up with this thread. Think I was the last straw for her, when I took exception to her post, and she took exception to my reply. What can I say, the girl supports her team right to her heart, good luck to her :)-D


Wish she'd come back though, and wish I'd never discussed footy with her, as it's more or less the only thing that we disagreed on.


Come back if you're reading!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...