Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Call me picky but I think you mis represented him - he did not maim another player as your original post suggested.


Your most recent post is correct. Your original one is not. A lot of people believe Keane ended Haaland's career, but he did not, so I get annoyed if people continue to state it as if it is fact.

He certainly didn't help though did he?


Keane was a very talented player, that is undeniable. However, in my book, he was not a "great" player, because he was a thug.


I am with Atila on this, you can't put Viera in the same league as Keane when it comes to aggression. Viera was/is a hard player, Keane was a nasty player.

I know exactl where atila is coming from, but in the first place you eiher got it wrong about Haaland, which is a genuine mistake, but refused to acknowledge it. Or you knew to begin with and that's plain dsingenuous, so also understand MM's frustration. It is naughty and helps perpetuate these falsehoods.


It's like the climategate email. By using misfirection it undermines the message that Keane is a thug and a bit of a nasty piece of work, which is true.

Viera was just as nasty a piece of work I'm afraid Keef. And football history is littered with players who were great AND thuggish. I think your distinction doesn't hold up.


Fair enough, but I disagree with you.


There have been players who are were thuggish, some wore the red of Liverpool, but IMO, Keane was something else, just a nasty man, who probably would have been banged up for GBH or worse, had he not been a good footballer.


Now, wait for the tirade of abuse.


Not necessary SP, for someone who claims to "ignore" Atila, you seem to try and wind him up more than anyone else on here. Surely better to just genuinely ignore him if he riles you, and then if he is abusive, you'll have more of a leg to stand on if you want to complain.


Just my opinion of course.

Changing the subject then...


I still ahven't seen the Lampard pen from yesterday. The Beeb say that Upson won tha ball, is that a fiar assessment? I don't remember ever seeing a penalty having to be taken three times.


I'd agree that Upson won the ball, but fair play to Lampard keeping his nerve 3 times, that can't have been an easy thing to do!

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I won't descend to your level or be baited by your

> response, just tell me when Viera went out of his

> way to maim a player like Keane, and then have the

> neck to admit to it. Keane was nasty, end of.


Now you have changed your wording - but of course I agree and accept that Keane did intend to hurt Haaland and hurt him badly (but in fact did not end his career).


Its difficult to be that type of ball winning player and not have an element of thuggery about you - it used to be a tough business in the middle of the park (not so much now). Greame Souness or Steve McMahon would be Liverpool equivalents.


Viera was more stylish but I'd much rather have Keane in my team than Viera. Keane's performance for Man United in the 1999 Champions League semi final against Juventus is as good am all round midfield performance as you are ever likely to see. He had everything.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I don't remember ever

> seeing a penalty having to be taken three times.



Yakubu for Pompey Vs Norwich in the Prem in about 2004. Same goalie - ironically - Robert Green!


Yak scored all three too!


Oh - and Roy Keane is a coont! ;)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cmon Matt.....say something....


Record as Rangers Manager 2001?2006


Scottish Premier League winners (2): 2002?03, 2004?05

Scottish Cup winners (2): 2002, 2003

Scottish League Cup winners (3): 2002, 2003, 2005


Martin O'Neil


SPL Championship (3) ? 2000/01, 2001/02, 2003/04

Scottish Cup (3) ? 2001, 2004, 2005

Scottish League Cup (1) ? 2000/01


I make that a double and a treble for McCleish versus one double for Martin O'Neil. I quite like McCleish as unlike other ex-Fergie players he seems a genuine good guy.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I make that a double and a treble for McCleish

> versus one double for Martin O'Neil. I quite like

> McCleish as unlike other ex-Fergie players he

> seems a genuine good guy.


Matt - Domestic trophies don't really give the answer - noone in Scotland thought Rangers were a better team than Celtic during this period. Celtic were unbeaten at home in 3 years under oneill including in Champions League.

In 2003 for example Celtic beat many good teams incl. Liverpool in their UEFA cup run and lost 3-2 to Mourinhos Porto team in the final - they lost the league and cup to Rangers that year, but were streets ahead of Rangers - just did not have a big enough squad to compete on all fronts. Even McLeish would admit that his team that won the treble was well short of Celtic.


But having seen your statistics I am slightly surprised - I did not think McLeish won as much as he did.


O Neill won the league 3 times in his first 4 years and in the other year reached the uefa cup final allowing rangers to nip in and win the league on goal difference - it should really have been 4 in a row. Don't forget that Celtic were playing the top teams in europe mid week over this period.


Martin O'Neill oversaw a record SEVEN consecutive wins over Rangers home and away. McLeish could not handle him.


No contest.


As for your original statement of McLeish getting to a CL Quarter final - thats incorrect - only Celtic have gotten out of the group stages in recent history (under gordon strachan).

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It wasn't a penalty, but then they had a

> legitimate handball penalty shout turned down

> earlier, so I'm not going to get upset.

>

> Would love to have seen him sky the last one

> though, that would have been very funny.


Don't fret too long I am sure he will oblige at the World Cup >:D<

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mockney piers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It wasn't a penalty, but then they had a

> > legitimate handball penalty shout turned down

> > earlier, so I'm not going to get upset.

> >

> > Would love to have seen him sky the last one

> > though, that would have been very funny.

>

> Don't fret too long I am sure he will oblige at

> the World Cup >:D<


How true!!

Quoted for Matt


> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > I make that a double and a treble for McCleish

> > versus one double for Martin O'Neil. I quite

> like

> > McCleish as unlike other ex-Fergie players he

> > seems a genuine good guy.






> Matt - Domestic trophies don't really give the

> answer - noone in Scotland thought Rangers were a

> better team than Celtic during this period. Celtic

> were unbeaten at home in 3 years under oneill

> including in Champions League.

> In 2003 for example Celtic beat many good teams

> incl. Liverpool in their UEFA cup run and lost 3-2

> to Mourinhos Porto team in the final - they lost

> the league and cup to Rangers that year, but were

> streets ahead of Rangers - just did not have a big

> enough squad to compete on all fronts. Even

> McLeish would admit that his team that won the

> treble was well short of Celtic.

>

> But having seen your statistics I am slightly

> surprised - I did not think McLeish won as much as

> he did.

>

> O Neill won the league 3 times in his first 4

> years and in the other year reached the uefa cup

> final allowing rangers to nip in and win the

> league on goal difference - it should really have

> been 4 in a row. Don't forget that Celtic were

> playing the top teams in europe mid week over this

> period.

>

> Martin O'Neill oversaw a record SEVEN consecutive

> wins over Rangers home and away. McLeish could not

> handle him.

>

> No contest.

>

> As for your original statement of McLeish getting

> to a CL Quarter final - thats incorrect - only

> Celtic have gotten out of the group stages in

> recent history (under gordon strachan).

Actually Mick, Rangers reached the last 16 in 2006 going out on away goals rule to Villareal


I'm not an expert on Scottish football, and not even sure that McCleish was in charge at the time, but the best Scottish team I've seen in recent years for actual football played was the Rangers that had Arteta and Barry Ferguson in midfield. Think it was an Old Firm match and remember thinking Arteta is the kind of player who'd do well at Liverpool. Sorry Mick not really a fan of up 'em and at 'em kinda football.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...