Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Martinez may be next for the chop. He's

> fallen into the Tony Mowbray syndrome of trying to

> get a group of sub standard footballers to 'play'

> their way out of the relegation dogfight. Better

> to take a leaf out of Tony Pulis' book. It's not

> pretty, but it's effective.


Agreed - and your point on Mowbray is right too, but I suspect Celtics passing game can work better in Scotland than WBA in England given Celtic have the most money in the league they should have better quality players to put the passing game in place. But you need to combine it with some finished product and they need to be in the market for a quality striker. Rangers have always been expert at taking chances and maximising their opportunities, thats what celtic need to do on Sunday. They do not do this under Mowbray, so far.

Celtic shots on target about 10 to rangers 1. But no excuse for not taking chances. Celtic have one player who takes his chances and he was on the bench for 70 minutes. Not understanding the need to have a proper goalscorer on the pitch is celtics biggest mistake.

Rangers will be pleased as they had some key players out.

Aiden McGeady was unplayable today.

Quite enjoyed the Old Firm clash - Celtic played some good football.


Congrats to Leeds United but would they have dominated the game if United's best player Darren Fletcher had been available for selection (remember how United only lost to Barcelona in CL final because their dynamic midfield maestro was banned).

Right now, I could not be happier.


Leeds certainly didn't look two leagues lower and imo Fletcher would have made no difference. Howson, Beckford and Naylor were a solid spine that never wilted against Man Utd. Snodgrass hit the bar and we had more than enough chances to score more than one.


A return to the top flight cannot be far away now.


Altogether a cracking game. Although how Wes Brown stayed on the pitch I don't know.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite enjoyed the Old Firm clash - Celtic played

> some good football.


Yes - it was a very good team performance - Celtic were more classy and more determined - played a high intensity passing game - if only for the finishing...


> (remember how United only lost to Barcelona in CL

> final because their dynamic midfield maestro was

> banned).


That's what MU fans like to believe, but to be honest they were outclassed that night.

FA Cup draw

southampton-Ipswich

reading/Dippers-Burnley

Millwall/Derby-Brentford/Doncaster

Bristol C/Cardiff C-Leicester

Stoke-ARSENAL

Notts Cty/Forest Green-Wigan

Scunthorpe-MANCHESTER CITY

WBA-Plymouth/Newcastle

Everton-Notts Forest/Birmingham

Accrington/Gills-Fulham

Bolton-Sheff Utd/QPR

Portsmouth/Coventry-Sumderland

PNE-CHELSEA

Aston Villa-Brighton

Tranmere/Wolves-Palace

SPURS-Leeds !!

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm interesting Mick I thought United deserved to

> win it last season just as much as they deserved

> to win in 1999 and 2008 against Bayern Munich and

> Chelsea


Deserved to win the final against Barcelona? you are joking Matt surely?


In 1999 they were the best team in the competition without doubt, but Bayern should have won the final, if only because Keane and Scholes were missing. Had MU they been full strength they might have won comfortably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Don't see an issue at all. Siunds like the protest is being made by friends and families of the two off licences, Morleys, pret and maxim chicken who are within 100 m of the school. Much ado about nothing. Besides if it doesn't proceed, the kids will walk a but further!!
    • Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint?  I can't see how this could work in practice. Surely Southwark residents go to these places quite frequently as well, particularly Tate Modern?  Will we have to take proof of residency every time we go out? What happens when family are with us who don't live in Southwark? Will other London boroughs start doing the same thing? Will Southwark residents be charged a tourist tax to visit "tourist attractions" in other areas, eg the V&A and the British Museum?
    • A shout out for Mark, owner of Pure Plumbers. 07970 971510 They're well established in the Sevenoaks area, but have recently started doing more work in SE London.  Did some v quick and efficient bathroom and boiler fixes for me; have also seen some of the bathrooms he's built, which have a nice attention to detail. Jessica    
    • Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...