Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He was already losing it before that England mishap whilst at Spurs.To be fair being a keeper is probably the most difficult position to play mentally. You don't get many opportunities to atone for errors, as opposed to outfield players who can make amends quite quickly as they see a lot more of the ball and the mistakes are not usually so critical.
Actually there's probably a case for all 3 of them. Didn't I read recently Wenger wanted to scrap throw ins and have the ball played in by kicking it? I think he is against the kind of thing Stoke do with Rory Delap. Of course kicking it in would eradicate that.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually there's probably a case for all 3 of

> them. Didn't I read recently Wenger wanted to

> scrap throw ins and have the ball played in by

> kicking it? I think he is against the kind of

> thing Stoke do with Rory Delap. Of course kicking

> it in would eradicate that.



Presumably similar to hockey and it ball cannot leave the ground and no run ups. Didn't they experiment with this a few years ago in non-league.

If it weren't for the Yanks being in charge Rafa would probably be gone after tonight's game but as they know jack shit about football they'll probably give him at least til end of season.


One title challenge in 6 seasons is not good enough for any European giant. Too many flaws in his make-up whether it be lack of passion/man-management (see the way Liverpool players celebrated going 1-0 up without even a handshake) or cautious tactics he has simply run out of excuses. Even the most blinded fan is now texting me demanding his head on a plate - adios Rafa bring back GH!! (that last bit is a joke)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...