Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He was already losing it before that England mishap whilst at Spurs.To be fair being a keeper is probably the most difficult position to play mentally. You don't get many opportunities to atone for errors, as opposed to outfield players who can make amends quite quickly as they see a lot more of the ball and the mistakes are not usually so critical.
Actually there's probably a case for all 3 of them. Didn't I read recently Wenger wanted to scrap throw ins and have the ball played in by kicking it? I think he is against the kind of thing Stoke do with Rory Delap. Of course kicking it in would eradicate that.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually there's probably a case for all 3 of

> them. Didn't I read recently Wenger wanted to

> scrap throw ins and have the ball played in by

> kicking it? I think he is against the kind of

> thing Stoke do with Rory Delap. Of course kicking

> it in would eradicate that.



Presumably similar to hockey and it ball cannot leave the ground and no run ups. Didn't they experiment with this a few years ago in non-league.

If it weren't for the Yanks being in charge Rafa would probably be gone after tonight's game but as they know jack shit about football they'll probably give him at least til end of season.


One title challenge in 6 seasons is not good enough for any European giant. Too many flaws in his make-up whether it be lack of passion/man-management (see the way Liverpool players celebrated going 1-0 up without even a handshake) or cautious tactics he has simply run out of excuses. Even the most blinded fan is now texting me demanding his head on a plate - adios Rafa bring back GH!! (that last bit is a joke)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "You have no idea why"   To be fair Sue, it's blindingly obvious to anyone who has a conversation with anyone who isn't a Corbyn supporter. And even some who liked Corbyn (like me initially) found him somewhat flaky even at his most popular But let's say you are right and I have NO idea why anybody might not vote for him. They still didn't vote for him. He lost two elections. The second one badly (and strongly predicted but the stubborn old goat wouldn't budge so we we were stuck with Johnson and another 3 million PMs in the 5 years that followed) So even with ZERO evidence, we have our eyes and ears and brains But we do have evidence   https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/27022-their-own-words-why-voters-abandoned-labour
    • As I said, it was my understanding. I worded it very carefully. I didn't/don't know for sure, so clearly not a fact. And hardly an "opinion", which is something completely different. You have no idea what reason anybody might have had for not voting for him (unless you can point to some opinion poll results which actually asked people?)
    • Also, just to add, the threat to kill someone's dog and try to kick it, is an additional extremely unpleasant layer. I have noticed a lot of the burst water balloons lying around in the park too- that is not great for the environment either.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...