Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He was already losing it before that England mishap whilst at Spurs.To be fair being a keeper is probably the most difficult position to play mentally. You don't get many opportunities to atone for errors, as opposed to outfield players who can make amends quite quickly as they see a lot more of the ball and the mistakes are not usually so critical.
Actually there's probably a case for all 3 of them. Didn't I read recently Wenger wanted to scrap throw ins and have the ball played in by kicking it? I think he is against the kind of thing Stoke do with Rory Delap. Of course kicking it in would eradicate that.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually there's probably a case for all 3 of

> them. Didn't I read recently Wenger wanted to

> scrap throw ins and have the ball played in by

> kicking it? I think he is against the kind of

> thing Stoke do with Rory Delap. Of course kicking

> it in would eradicate that.



Presumably similar to hockey and it ball cannot leave the ground and no run ups. Didn't they experiment with this a few years ago in non-league.

If it weren't for the Yanks being in charge Rafa would probably be gone after tonight's game but as they know jack shit about football they'll probably give him at least til end of season.


One title challenge in 6 seasons is not good enough for any European giant. Too many flaws in his make-up whether it be lack of passion/man-management (see the way Liverpool players celebrated going 1-0 up without even a handshake) or cautious tactics he has simply run out of excuses. Even the most blinded fan is now texting me demanding his head on a plate - adios Rafa bring back GH!! (that last bit is a joke)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...