Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Re Redknapp - some due dilligence findings from the various recent Pompey takeovers also revealled that he was on huge commission on player sales from Pompey -bearing in mind we have sold over ?100m in players in the last year he must have had a good whack.


Tax evasion charge however ALLEGEDLY relates to signing of Papa Diop from Fulham, apparently some money ALLEGEDLY found it's way to Harry's cayman islands account (likewise Mandaric and Storrie) ALLEGEDLY!!!

Re Hart. Thoroughtly decent bloke shoddilly treated by Pompey and now QPR. One of footballs good guys and deserves better!


BTW just bumped into some 'Wall in Lewisham this morning and as I am sporting my colours today I took a little bit of mouth from them, however they assured me that they would, in their words "Do the Scummers" this weekend!


Nice lads, one was a coppper!

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stoke v Liverpool, 0-4


Just a tad overly optimistic methinks, even old boy Lawro has this down as a home win. Given that you will be without Gerrard, Benayoun, and Torres, I tend to agree with him.

Villa are a bit up and down at the moment and I think that will continue - they had a good result midweek so now I expect the come down as West Ham put up a bit of resistance and have a go. Minimum of 1 point for the Hammers.


Without the out of form G&T I am expecting Liverpool to play as a team tomorrow - likes of Ngog, Lucas and Babel to be the heroes. Minimum 3 points.

breaking news... hahaha... that's been flying around since the last speculation was exhausted... don't believe everything you read in the papers atila


The entire team looks like it needs a new challenge.. and the best way to do that is not by selling scapegoats. I hope Babel holds his ground and not lets himself be bullied out of the Club (Rafa has reacted to Torres and Gerrard being injured to dropping Babel from squad tomorrow) the way Keane was dumped 12 months ago.

In criminal law, provocation is a possible defense by excuse or exculpation alleging a sudden or temporary loss of control as a response to another's provocative conduct sufficient to justify an acquittal, a mitigated sentence or a conviction for a lesser charge.


Dear old Wikki.

I guess they made it as early as possible. Announced at 10am. Certainly looked likely with the snow melting. Certainly suits Pompey though with so many players absent, and playing extra time Tuesday night. Gonna be a pile up of fixtures in coming months.


Reckon we might get a point from the rearranged game, which we would not have got today.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess they made it as early as possible.

> Announced at 10am. Certainly looked likely with

> the snow melting. Certainly suits Pompey though

> with so many players absent, and playing extra

> time Tuesday night. Gonna be a pile up of fixtures

> in coming months.

>

> Reckon we might get a point from the rearranged

> game, which we would not have got today.


When I posted didn't realise how much rain there had been until I stuck my head out of door a bit later. Most fans I know travel independently so were en route when game was called off. It means I can buy a ticket off a mate who can't do Birmingham-Portsmouth journey midweek and see us get our rightful three points!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...