Jump to content

Recommended Posts

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Listened on R5. With 30 minutes to go Lee Dixon

> said he wouldn't be surprised if ManU scored a

> couple more. He also boasted that he couldn't have

> done any worse in Arsenal's defence.



Think Lee Dixon said he could play in the United Defence .... that was the level to which they were troubled at that point.


I think the Chelsea Arsenal game could not have been better timed... Arsenal to pull their finger out and United have a damn good 8 days with Chelsea losing the points and game in hand!

United did impress - but the ease at which they tore Arsenal apart on the counter attack is what you usually associate with relegation fodder. I reckon if Arsenal are not careful they'll soon be pulled into this dog fight for 4th spot. Next Sunday, Chelsea with Drogba back, will run through Arsenal like a hot knife through butter.

benjaminty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kpc Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Listened on R5. With 30 minutes to go Lee Dixon

> > said he wouldn't be surprised if ManU scored a

> > couple more. He also boasted that he couldn't

> have

> > done any worse in Arsenal's defence.

>

>

> Think Lee Dixon said he could play in the United

> Defence .... that was the level to which they were

> troubled at that point.

>

Fair point - must pay better attention!

Good to say Wenger do his usual routine of refusing to give any credit to opposition when a result doesn't go his way. However, he doesn't mind crediting teams Arsenal have beaten. Very patronising. United were superb yesterday. Credit where it's due Vinegar face.
If he did say it I'm sure it was brief and through gritted teeth. He should also take responsibility for defeat. Is Diaby injured? If not why is he not playing. He is a physical presence and a good player who can score goals. Also his refusal to bring in a proper striker. Arshaving is a number 10 type player, not a focal point for the attack. Bentner has not got the quality to lead the Arsenal line. The keeper is average as well. I don't understand why he doesn't go and get David James on a free? He's just brought Campbell in so age can't be an issue.

Funnily enough I'm with his philosphy of not going out and buying, just because. To allow young players to come through they must have room and time to play


What has happened with that however, is those players have not stepped up. To get spanked once at home is no great shame. But Chelsea and Man U keep coming to the Emirates and crucifying us. I applaud Wenger's faith in the players and I wouldn't retrospectively change much - apart from maybe getting a keeper in. Saying get James in is all very well but you don't have to have a vivid imagination to imagine him making mistakes in crucial games as well


On top of that, in the longer run Arsenal will be in rude health and Man Utd will be in big trouble financially.


When the time comes for Wenger to go (or get pushed) we will look back on seasons where we finish in the top 4 regularly with fondness

Sean I agree with your sentiment. But, there is a compromise position and it's not like Wegner hasn't pulled out the cheque book before. Strikers are expensive but you need a proper old fashioned hitman (well me and MM thought so) and a half decent keeper - just those two would make a difference and not break the bank. Wegner's philosophy although basically sensible sometimes does look like 'not getting that penny's worth of tar' on principle. Agree with you about young players not coming through as hoped, especially Walcott.
I agree Sean with his faith in young players. But striker and keeper are crucial areas to gamble with. Mistakes in goal can cost you a game and it appears obvious that he doesn't have a striker with the kind of physicality and ability of a Rooney. Torres or Drogba. He went out and bought a good quality centre half when he purchased Vermaelen so he obviously realized this was an area that needed sorting. With regards to James, I thought he'd ironed out the flakey side of his game? Maybe I've got that wrong?

or Jose Antonio reyes for 13.5! And let's not even mention Franny Jeffers


I think it's not so much stubborness (although he has that to burn) but his experience of going out to spend money hasn't resulted in many successes so why do it now. And knowing us we could spend 60 million tomorrow and they would be on the treatment table for 6 months


That doesn't mean he is right, but I can understand his reluctance


Quids and jimmy - i agree with you both - a keeper and a good striker would have made the world of difference - I just don't think it's that easy to get them

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...