Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like Sullivan will playing bad cop and Gold good cop (good being comparative in this case) with Zola stuck right in the middle. It also looks like a case of getting your excuses in first and blaming everyone else for whatever happens for the rest of the season. Go down and it will be down to the greedy players, previous regime, etc; stay up and it will be down to Sullivan/Gold saving the club from the brink of extinction....
Will have to give this predicer thing a go later. Ideal results tonight - besides for our 3 points - would be wins for Arsenal, ManU, Chelsea and Wolves (given the respective managers in the night's other game, frankly I don't give a damn). Football creates strange temporary alliances.

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good to see I am not alone on West Ham 10-12th

> All good

>

> Wonder what will happen to Man City and Mancini if

> they don't get Champs league



Makes no difference, Mancini is only with us til summer then Maurinho will be taking charge. Mancinis "6mnths and three years" statement wasn't a slip of the tongue !

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Such a shame. Something seriously needs to be done

> about the debt in the Premier League or Pompey

> will be the first of many.

>

> Really feel for you Ratty.



Yes indeed, what Anna said. Would be a shame if the same fate befell ManUre. Can you imagine the out pouring of grief on this thread.

It is a bit odd that there is much head-shaking about clubs going into admin (or close) to at exactly the same time that Wenger is under pressure to spend (probably) more money than he has available


A weaker man than Wenger could easily take us down the road of a Leeds

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes they do, but that is not the core tenet of representative democracy. At that level, we are voting for a parliamentary representative, irregardless of whether parties exist or not. It's why candidates can stand as independents. 
    • Sadly I think you will never convince people like this. They think gardens have to be kept chopped back and controlled. My theory is that this comes from being (or trying to be) controlling in every aspect of their lives, so I doubt if anything you could say or show them would have any effect. But are they actually coming into your garden or leaning over into it and pulling up/damaging things? If so, maybe one of our community police people could have a word with them?
    • Dear Nature lovers - advice please. I am being harassed by a neighbour who doesn't like my standard of gardening which she calls 'messy'. (I have rewilded my garden with advice from the London Wildlife Trust and a gardening expert from The Times.) I have twice caught this neighbour and her husband pulling up my plants and damaging my trees. Plus she has photographed my house, and sent a dozen complaints to the Dulwich Estate about my plan to rewild the verge outside my property - approved by the Estate some 4 years ago in line with their stated policy of supporting biodiversity in and around Dulwich. What can I do to introduce these neighbours  to the benefits to us all of returning a portion of our gardens to nature?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...