Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sat 3rd April Man Utd Chelsea

>

> Could all be over by then?


Although Arsenal are not the strongest team (hence home & away defeats to both Utd and Chelsea) they have a significantly easier run in to the title than either Utd or Chelsea which will be made a lot smoother if they lose to Porto in CL tomorrow night.

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sat 3rd April Man Utd Chelsea

>

> Could all be over by then?


Yep...



Premier League Table - March 7 2010

Pos...Team..............P........Pts

1.....Man. United.....29......63

2.....Chelsea...........28......61

3.....Arsenal............29......61

4.....T. Hotspur........28......49

5.....Man. City..........27......49


C'mon you Red Devils...



Matthew123 Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

>"Although Arsenal are not the strongest team..."


how diplomatic!

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >"Although Arsenal are not the strongest team..."

>

>

> how diplomatic!


Matthew 123 has said this on many occasions, he has often made reference to the fact that, and these are his words "Arsenal are physically weak", but I noticed when we beat Liverpool both home and away, he didn't mention it then. Perhaps because this would have made his own beloved Liverpool, by his own definition, weaker than Arsenal.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Matthew 123 has said..."Arsenal are phsically weak",

> but I noticed when we beat Liverpool both home and

> away, he didn't mention it then. Perhaps because

> this would have made his own beloved Liverpool, by

> his own definition, weaker than Arsenal.



*massive burst of laughter*


Fabulously astute analysis Atila!;-)


Oh...while I'm here...hey everyone, I really didn't mean to offend anyone earlier (including you Jah)...am just having a laugh...there's not much else going on on the forum at the moment...hopefully (for you) I'll be out of your hair soon xxx

I think relatively speaking Arsenal are physically weaker than Liverpool, United and Chelsea (hell look at their continual injury list!) ... and you could also say they are weaker than Bolton, Blackburn etc. But my remark was about Arsenal not being the strongest/best team in the division.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think relatively speaking Arsenal are physically

> weaker than Liverpool, United and Chelsea (hell

> look at their continual injury list!) ... and you

> could also say they are weaker than Bolton,

> Blackburn etc. But my remark was about Arsenal not

> being the strongest/best team in the division.


Then using your criteria, we are stronger than Liverpool, Bolton and Blackburn. We haven't lost to any of those teams. Secondly, the only team I thought we were physically overrun was the home loss to Man U.We certainly didn't look weak when they, ONLY JUST beat us at their place, with the help of a dubious penalty decison, but thats one of those things, we didn't look phyically weak at Stamford Bridge and didn't play that badly. This physically weak thing is nonsense. Getting injured doesn't mean that our players are weak, unlucky, certainly, victims of some overly zealous challenges, oh yes. But physically weak? Diaby, Song, Vermaelen, Eboue, these do not come across as weak players, and Campbell certainly isn't weak . The easiest man to push off a ball, regularly fall over, I've ever seen play in the Prem is Emile Heskey, and how big is he!!!!


Arsenal physically weak, as the French would say NON!

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush has shown me that he's ready to behave

> and is back in the room.


Well it was a bit unbecoming for a gentleman to be kicked out of his own thread. Provocation I'd say.


PS How did he show you?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Administrator Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush has shown me that he's ready to behave

> > and is back in the room.

>

>

> Oh crikey!


You can run, but you can't hide........

>

> *screams for help and legs it at full speed*

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush has shown me that he's ready to behave

> and is back in the room.


Double standards have been applied here. Whatever the provocation, he was banned and rightly so. Does this mean we can all start name calling, beg forgiveness and be let back in?

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chris Waddle has launched a withering attack on

> Theo Walcott after his performance for England

> against Egypt last night, accusing the Arsenal

> winger of lacking a "football brain". The former

> England international is not convinced Walcott has

> developed his game since he broke into the

> Southampton team as a teenager. "


Was he also at the game on Saturday when the kid had a blinder and scored an excellent goal?

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Walcott scored a goal on sunday and in your

> words had a 'good game'. One swallow doesn't make

> a summer. He's crap.


Just like you're team son. Chosen ones? For what, the butt of everyones jokes? As for crap, your team is littered with it as are your fans and your club.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • She also suggested that the 2017 Manchester terror attack (perpetrated by an Islamist extremist) was due to "divisiveness" and tried to pin the blame on the far right. Grim, really. 
    • Thankfully, it seems that yesterday's "Red vs Blue" school wars thing has turned out to be a hoax/ nonsense/ whatever. (See link below if you managed to avoid this stuff). In years to come, we might found out who - or which countries - has an interest in testing what happens when you post socially disruptive content online about fake events... In the meantime, thank you to our local teachers and other school workers, police community support officers and police officers. My commute happens to take me past a bunch of schools at dropoff/pickup times, and I noticed a much greater and more visible presence on streets outside/near schools than normal. Annoying as it must have been to be distracted from other important duties, I really value and appreciate them looking out for the kids. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/school-wars-trend-red-blue-london-police-latest-142328025.html https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jan/01/birmingham-new-year-fireworks-display-centenary-square-police  
    • Hi Eleanor, I run the Just Dance Fit classes mentioned above. It would be lovely to have you there. I’m at the dance studio at Harris Girls’ Academy on Homestall Road throughout the year every Monday, Wednesday and Sunday: Mondays 6:30-7:30pm - Just Dance Fit Mondays 7:30-8:30pm - Flowetic Wednesdays 6:30-7:30pm - Flowetic Sundays 10:30-11:30am - Flowetic Lots of information and booking via the website: www.justdanceuk.com but if you have any questions don’t hesitate to drop me a line at 07522 231 446 or [email protected]. Hope this helps! Fiona =)
    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...